On 2009-04-30 14:32-0500 Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> On Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 19:48:40 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes:
> > I quite like your idea of something like 5.9.2+ though as it is simple.
>
> Just wanted to point out a potential downside.. if anyone does version number
> parsing & expects num
On Thursday, April 30, 2009 at 19:48:40 (+0100) Andrew Ross writes:
> I quite like your idea of something like 5.9.2+ though as it is simple.
Just wanted to point out a potential downside.. if anyone does version number
parsing & expects numeric fields throughout, their code will likely barf on
t
On 2009-04-30 19:52+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
>> On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>>> Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?
>>
>> Good question.
>>
>> Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?
>
> Good question.
>
> Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version
> numbers, etc.) occur as part of the release process
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30:16AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?
>
> Good question.
>
> Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version
> numbers, etc.) occur as part of the release pro
On 2009-04-30 09:23-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?
Good question.
Normally, all version bumps (overall release version, library version
numbers, etc.) occur as part of the release process (see
README.Release_Manager_Cookbook). So the overall version bump to 5
Time to bump version to 5.9.3 in svn?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
---
