The lack of testing is a bit of a concern. There are also several
outstanding issues which we want to address so I suggest the
next release might not be too long in the pipeline.
Andrew
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:40:05PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> Hi Jerry:
>
> I am moving this discussion to
Hi Jerry:
I am moving this discussion to the list because of some general comments I
want to make.
On 2010-06-04 21:03-0700 m...@bauck.net wrote:
> Alan,
>
> All done with Ada examples 28 and 29. That should make Ada up-to-date with
> respect to the bindings and matching C Postscript output.
T
Doug, there is a fairly urgent question for you below. There is also a less
urgent question for Werner.
I have just started another round of testing this weekend in anticipation of
the release next weekend, and here is the current status of the results from
the test_diff_psc target (which is run
Hello,
I had a look yesterday at the Tcl examples and at the way we produce the
bindings for Tcl and suddenly realised that we do not use the stubs
mechanism, even though the source code is prepared for them (it requires
a flag USE_TCL_STUBS and linking against the stubs library).
The advantage o
I'll get the Ada up to speed soon.
Jerry
On May 18, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Andrew Ross wrote:
> Ada, lua and d are still awaiting the porting of plstransform and
> examples. Volunteers?
--
__
Just to update on Alan's email last week. I've now fixed up f77, f95,
java and python. Tcl is also in order.
The fortran changes also involved tidying up plmap / plmeridian.
Example 19 use an identify transform since fortran does not support
NULL functions. This does not work as the generalised c
Hello,
On 2010-05-12 19:53, Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> >
> > This example require Tcl 8.5 or later: use of NaNs
>
> I've taken a look into Tcl example 21, and I'm not very convinced. What I
> find is that when I comment out the return which currently bails if you don't
Alan W. Irwin writes:
> On 2010-05-11 12:29-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
>
> > Geoffrey Furnish writes:
> > > Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > > > C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
> > > > non-perfect bindings:
> > > >
> > > > tcl
> > > >Missing examples
On 2010-05-11 23:53+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> Alan's idea of using cmp may be more efficient on
> Linux. I've not tried timing it. Not copying large files around must be
> more efficient. Is cmp widely available on non-Linux platforms? I suspect
> diff / tail are more common.
>
> The main reason I
On Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 12:29:42 (-0500) Geoffrey Furnish writes:
> BTW, the only difference I see in example 21 postscript output, is the time
> stamp:
>
> [furn...@ziffy]~/devel/pldev/test/examples% diff x21c.psc x21t.psc
> 6c6
> < %%CreationDate: Sat May 8 23:48:27 2010
> ---
> > %
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > Since your question is of general interest to developers, I am posting my
> > reply to the list.
> >
> > > I'm working on Tcl #19. I'm close to getting it straightened out, hope
> to
> > > commit s
Alan W. Irwin writes:
> Since your question is of general interest to developers, I am posting my
> reply to the list.
>
> > I'm working on Tcl #19. I'm close to getting it straightened out, hope to
> > commit soon.
> >
> > Question: In my own comparisons between the C and Tcl examples,
>
On 2010-05-11 12:29-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> Geoffrey Furnish writes:
> > Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > > C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
> > > non-perfect bindings:
> > >
> > > tcl
> > >Missing examples:
> > >Differing postscript outp
On 2010-05-11 11:43-0500 Geoffrey Furnish wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
> > non-perfect bindings:
> > [...]
> > tcl
> >Missing examples:
> >Differing postscript output : 19 21 28
> >Missin
Geoffrey Furnish writes:
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
> > non-perfect bindings:
> >
> > tcl
> >Missing examples:
> >Differing postscript output : 19 21 28
> >Missing stdout :
>
Alan W. Irwin writes:
> C++ and OCaml are perfect, and here is the status of the remaining
> non-perfect bindings:
>
> tcl
>Missing examples:
>Differing postscript output : 19 21 28
>Missing stdout :
>Differing stdout: 21
I believe I'
16 matches
Mail list logo
