On 2009-02-17 20:09+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>> For the record, what platform produced the above result?
>>
> Ubuntu 8.10 (32-bit). Windows as well, although differences are found for
> example 14 in the standard output - which I can't confirm, since the output
> is identical (tes
Hi Alan,
> For the record, what platform produced the above result?
>
Ubuntu 8.10 (32-bit). Windows as well, although differences are found
for example 14 in the standard output - which I can't confirm, since the
output is identical (tested with winmerge). I think the script needs
further mo
On 2009-02-17 11:29+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>>
>>
>> Here are the present results:
>>
>> lua
>> Missing examples: 09 14 14a 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27
>> 28 29 30 31
>> Differing postscript output : 08 11 12 13 18
>> Missing stdout :
>> Differi
Hi Alan,
>
>
> Here are the present results:
>
> lua
> Missing examples: 09 14 14a 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23
> 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
> Differing postscript output : 08 11 12 13 18
> Missing stdout :
> Differing stdout :
>
> The examples actually run for th
On 2009-01-30 10:13+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
> I'm just trying to run the test. One note: in lua.cmake you use VERSION_LESS
> but this is obviously not available for cmake 2.6.0 which is installed by
> default on Ubuntu 8.10. I had to apt-remove cmake, install the latest
> executable 2.6.2 and
I have now implemented full testing of the Lua examples in the installed
examples tree (using "make test" there). If anybody else wants to try
this use -DENABLE_lua=ON.
Examples 1 and 8 have been added to the list of what is tested (since
they no longer have run-time errors). Since Lua example 1
Hi Alan,
thanks a lot for the test script. This helps a lot!
> I now (revision 9415) have ctest implemented for Lua.
>
> [ ]
>
> are currently perfect.
>
> Can you run ctest with the suggested workaround for missing example
> 01 to
> confirm these results as well? The current result of ro
On 2009-01-29 14:58-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> More to follow with the goals of getting (1) ctest in the build tree and (2)
> "make test" in the installed examples tree to work for the Lua case.
Hi Werner:
I now (revision 9415) have ctest implemented for Lua.
I had to remove the following exam
On 2009-01-27 15:13-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> For the Lua case, I suggest we include a file that is configured with the
> correct absolute location (build tree location for now) of plplotluac.
I have now (revision 9414) implemented that idea. The result is only lightly
tested (after running mak
On 2009-01-26 10:47+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
>> * How do you run the examples?
>
> * Enable lua bindings with -DENABLE_lua=ON
> * lua, lualib, lualiblib must be installed, plus developer packages
> (Ubuntu/Debian)
> * cd build-directory/bindings/lua (here you should find plplotluac.so)
> * lua s
Hi Alan,
On 24.01.2009, at 23:20, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Hi Werner:
>
> I have some questions about your Lua bindings and examples.
>
> * Are the bindings specific to Lua 5.0?
Not really, but I only test the bindings and the examples with lua 5.0
at the moment. I made a test with lua 5.1 in an
11 matches
Mail list logo
