P.S. Since I don't seem to be in position to test menu changes, I cannot test
this myself, but
http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/db2x_docbook2texi.1.html says
***
Elements in the source document can influence the Texinfo node name
generation specifying either a xreflabel, or for the sectio
On 2007-07-03 14:14-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>> [...] I am inclined to go with your
>> changes except keeping the overall title as is.
>
> Here's what I'm trying to produce, an info entry that looks like:
>
> * PLplot: (plplotdoc). The PLplot Plotting Librar
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-07-02 16:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> Argh, looks like there is a bug in docbook2X 0.8.7 that causes
>> --to-stdout to be ignored, so that doesn't work. Looks like this has
>> been around for a while so make sure you aren't ending up with an
>> empty plplo
On 2007-07-02 16:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Argh, looks like there is a bug in docbook2X 0.8.7 that causes --to-stdout to
> be ignored, so that doesn't work. Looks like this has been around for a
> while so make sure you aren't ending up with an empty plplotdoc.texi in
> addition to the_
On 2007-07-02 16:47-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The point is that the nothing in plplot *itself* requires XML::SAX::Expat,
> not that XML::SAX::Expat is needed at all. You just need the db2x_*
> utilities. Whatever packages provides those need to be concerned about
> XML::SAX::Expat, not pl
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-06-29 17:04-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> Second is something I think I reported before, which is that nothing
>> in plplot calls perl's XML::SAX::Expat parser:
>
> I did a check for SAX appearing anywhere in the source tree, and I agree
> that XML::SAX::Expat a
On 2007-06-29 17:04-0600 Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>>
>> Hmm. docbook2texi isn't mentioned in our documentation build. Looking
>> at the docbook2texi man page it is concerned with SGML. We use the XML
>> version of docbook instead.
>>
>> Looking at doc/docbook/src/CMakeLists.txt, the info file
>
> Hmm. docbook2texi isn't mentioned in our documentation build. Looking
> at the docbook2texi man page it is concerned with SGML. We use the XML
> version of docbook instead.
>
> Looking at doc/docbook/src/CMakeLists.txt, the info files are created by a
> series of custom commands involving