On 2019-09-07 16:46+0930 Jonathan Woithe wrote:
Hi Alan
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 01:36:30PM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
As someone here with a large familiarity with Qt, I would appreciate
you letting me know if you forsee any trouble with this overall plan
to remove our Qt4 support. And comme
On 2019-09-06 21:33-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
@Hazen: In light of the smoke binding issue we should discuss this
still tentative roadmap further.
That smoke binding issue is bindings/qt_gui/smoke/ needs to be removed
when we drop support for Qt4 because [smoke is not available for
Qt5](https
Hi Alan
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 01:36:30PM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> As someone here with a large familiarity with Qt, I would appreciate
> you letting me know if you forsee any trouble with this overall plan
> to remove our Qt4 support. And comments on this plan from the other
> PLplot devel
@Hazen: In light of the smoke binding issue we should discuss this
still tentative roadmap further.
That smoke binding issue is bindings/qt_gui/smoke/ needs to be removed
when we drop support for Qt4 because [smoke is not available for
Qt5](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20636312). You
On 2019-09-02 13:36-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Hi António:
Your fix of the serious Qt5 font configuration bug for PLplot made our
Qt5 results in PLplot-5.15.0 essentially as good as our Qt4 results
for the first time ever. So ever since that release it has been on my
mind to greatly reduce the
Hi Allan,
I really think that is safe to remove qt4 support. Sooner or later qt4 will
not be available by default in a normal linux distribution.
So I agree with your proposed roadmap.
cheers,
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:36 PM Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
> Hi António:
>
> Your fix of the serious Qt5 f
