Re: [Plplot-devel] Debian bug 761057

2014-09-18 Thread Andrew Ross
I've completely reformatted the debian copyright file (using the new machine readable format) and done some grepping for rogue files. I've attached a copy and I think this identified all the non-LGPL files ( parts of files) apart from the additional libraries shipped in lib (which I also need to

Re: [Plplot-devel] Debian bug 761057

2014-09-18 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2014-09-18 14:13+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > I've completely reformatted the debian copyright file (using the new > machine readable format) and done some grepping for rogue files. I've > attached a copy and I think this identified all the non-LGPL files ( > parts of files) apart from the addit

Re: [Plplot-devel] Debian bug 761057

2014-09-18 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2014-09-18 14:13+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > I've completely reformatted the debian copyright file (using the new > machine readable format) and done some grepping for rogue files. I've > attached a copy and I think this identified all the non-LGPL files ( > parts of files) apart from the addit

Re: [Plplot-devel] Debian bug 761057

2014-09-18 Thread Phil Rosenberg
Hi Alan and Andrew The shapelib files from Ordnance Survey are my doing. You are right Alan that they are under licence rather than in the public domain, however, I used them specifically because they were available under an open type licence. I did look hard and ordnance survey was the best sou

Re: [Plplot-devel] Debian bug 761057

2014-09-18 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2014-09-18 21:18+0100 Phil Rosenberg wrote: > Hi Alan and Andrew > The shapelib files from Ordnance Survey are my doing. You are right Alan that they are under licence rather than in the public domain, however, I used them specifically because they were available under an open type licence. I