Then I say, the same trouble i posted on Aug. 11 occured, i.e.
"Delete All" leaves some document in the current category.
Did you try to do that?
At Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:56:59 +0200,
Michael Nordstrvm wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001, MATSUMOTO Masakazu wrote:
> > Newest version 1.1.13 seems to ha
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001, MJ Ray wrote:
> Start the preparations, but expect Python 1.x to be common for at least
> another six months.
I don't think we should "stall" our development just because python 2
isn't available on all systems. It's not like the "old" parser will
disappear (and neither is 2
> I'm looking at the support for alternate sizes of images, and wondering
> if something should change.
As you know from a previous message, there's a definate mathematical
scaling factor issue with the current image parsers in the Python code. I
haven't been able to locate where this ha
I'm looking at the support for alternate sizes of images, and
wondering if something should change.
To refresh everyone's memory: There are two kinds of image pages
included in a Plucked document, inline and separate. Inline occur in
a text page; separate occur as separate pages, either the home
> You have to build several arrays
> which construct silos to fetch and parse from. You should have a "seen"
> "dead" or "down", "fetch", "duplicate" and "completed" arrays (or however
> Python keeps it straight).
Yes, that sounds like a good design.
Bill
> I'd be surprised if our Solaris systems had Python 2 yet.
Really! Interesting... I'd have thought most folks were ahead of me
in moving up.
Thanks.
Bill
> I tried to download the following item, but always fails. Windows
> ME/NT/98/95 version (offsite link)
Try this (and upgrade your browser to something more compliant):
Permanent URLs to the latest Version (1.1.13) of the Plucker Windows
installer
- For the Webpage: http://www.dirk-h
I tried to download the following item, but always fails.
Windows ME/NT/98/95 version (offsite link)
> How does it handle "promises" which are identical from different
> sites? Pavuk handles this very well, you may want to look at the source.
..and also, how does it handle:
http://slashdot.org";>
vs.
The content retrieved wi
> Adding multi-process fetching of Web pages would indeed speed things up,
> but it would also increase the likelihood of bugs significantly.
We talked about this for awhile on the perl parser with the
LWP::Parallel (which is blindingly fast, the same fetch under python takes 4
minutes l
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001, MATSUMOTO Masakazu wrote:
> Newest version 1.1.13 seems to have this problem...
You'll have to provide more info. Saying that it "seems"
to have a problem isn't good enough.
/Mike
Bill:
> I'm wondering if the world is ready for the next release of Plucker to
> require Python 2.x? [...]
Until the next stable Debian ships (and does anyone know if it's with Python
2?), I'm going to have to say "No", in my opinion. I know that Debian
stable is regarded as somewhat behind the
Nag,
You can not use just copy .rcp.in to a .rcp file. This project is written
on Linux platform and uses autoconfig. So .rcp is generated using .in and
other files. If you have to do this manually, the .rcp files in langs\
dir contain real message strings.
good luck.
Danny Zeng
At 16:
14 matches
Mail list logo
