Re: :-( parsing javadoc

2003-01-03 Thread David A. Desrosiers
> I would have to say that it is not illegal as written. I would have to > regard this problem as a parser bug myself. It works here with Python 2.1, fails with Python 2.2, as expected. I agree though, but the pages still don't validate =) d. ___

Re: :-( parsing javadoc

2003-01-03 Thread Edward Rayl
David A. Desrosiers wrote: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd> It seems like the parser is unable to parse this line. When this line is remove (by hand) plucker agrees to import the page into my palm. Isn't this supposed to be on three separate li

Re: Automating preplucked pluckings

2003-01-03 Thread David A. Desrosiers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Did you ever have any luck with this? This is the first I've ever seen this. When did you send the original message? I don't remember seeing this perl script on the list before. Did you send it to one of the lists? > > opendir(IDIR,"d:/dev

Re: :-( parsing javadoc

2003-01-03 Thread David A. Desrosiers
> Transitional//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd> > It seems like the parser is unable to parse this line. When this line is > remove (by hand) plucker agrees to import the page into my palm. Isn't this supposed to be on three separate lines, prefixed by the encoding type?