> Well, I can understand it not being on the windows side (and no I'm not
> volunteering ;-). Why isn't it on the linux side either?
Because explode/unpluck are not built or shipped by default.
Similar to most Linux applications where the ./contrib directory under the
source tree isn't a
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 at 11:36, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> > Is there any reason this isn't included in the Plucker Desktop
> > distribution? Why must I have to compile from source to get these tools?
>
> Probably because the desktop should be just that, a desktop.
>
> The other reason
> Is there any reason this isn't included in the Plucker Desktop
> distribution? Why must I have to compile from source to get these tools?
Probably because the desktop should be just that, a desktop.
The other reason is probably that nobody has tried to port the
code over to Win
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 at 11:02, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> > Is there any way to export from a plucker doc to xml? Or html?
>
> Unpluck/explode, in the tools subdirectory.
Is there any reason this isn't included in the Plucker Desktop distribution?
Why must I have to compile from source to
> Is there any way to export from a plucker doc to xml? Or html?
Unpluck/explode, in the tools subdirectory.
d.
___
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 10:11:56AM -0500, Dave Maddock wrote:
> > I'm using Vade Mecum to read plucker documents, and I like the
> > annotations and highlighting. My once-trusty visor edge died, so I
> > don't know if the official viewer does that or not.
>
> Nope, this is Vade Mecum specific.
>
