On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, Robert O'Connor wrote:
The pacifier does raise a few questionmarks in corporate
deployments
Well, if anyone wants to deploy Plucker in a corporate environment
then I guess they will be competent enough to change the icon if they
find it questionable ;-) I have another Free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wouldn't mind a logo submission contest, and either choose a simplified
stylized pacifier or another logo, and use it consistently across
everything. Some prototypes submitted, then community votes. Similar to
the Debian logo decision some
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 15:46, Bill Janssen wrote:
My vote is to keep the pacifier. I like it, it's not offensive, and
it is still relevant to the project name.
I find it mildly offensive.
___
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, just to keep things clear, I was quoting DD there.
I personally am not fond of the pacifier.
David McNab wrote:
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 15:46, Bill Janssen wrote:
My vote is to keep the pacifier. I like it, it's not offensive, and
it is still relevant to the project name.
I find
But I have to admit I cringe somewhat when I see its 'pacifier' icon on
my Palm screen. I'm not sure what the connection is between a superb
off-line hypertext browser and a tool for calming crying babies.
Why, you 'Pluck' the pacifier out of their mouths, and that's what causes the crying.
At 11:27 PM 10/21/2002 +0100, Robert O'Connor wrote:
But I have to admit I cringe somewhat when I see its 'pacifier' icon on
my Palm screen. I'm not sure what the connection is between a superb
off-line hypertext browser and a tool for calming crying babies.
Why, you 'Pluck' the pacifier out
I wouldn't mind a logo submission contest, and either choose a simplified stylized
pacifier or
another logo, and use it consistently across everything. Some prototypes submitted,
then
community votes. Similar to the Debian logo decision some years back.
Sounds good to me. I'd be happy to
