Hi Eugene, Thanks for your letter. You can add it on the bugs list at bugs.plkr.org as a feature request. That will give the best forum for tracking, etc. The implenation is pretty straightfoward--there is a singleinstancechecker class ready to go.
Best wishes, Robert On 28 Jan 2003 at 9:06, Eugene Y. Vasserman wrote: > I think we need a "allow only one instance" for plucker desktop, due to > the problem of overwriting .ini file when one version of desktop updates > or adds a channel, and another one does not. Either that, or .ini file > needs to be re-parsed on quit, and merged with current into in memory... > This seems pretty important, as information on newly > added/deleted/updated channels can be lost very easily. Any thoughts? > Thanks, > eugene > > -- > Eugene "Gman" Vasserman > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://uranium.cataclasm.org/~eugene/ > _______________________________________________ > plucker-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev > .---~~~~~~---. ________________________________________ / \ / \ MedicalMnemonics.com | __ | .-------+` `+-------. A free non-profit online searchable | | () | | database of medical mnemonics to help `-------+.__.+-------' remember the important details. (| O O |) ^\ /^ http://www.medicalmnemonics.com \ \ / / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ ~~~~ / ________________________________________ `-_ _-' ~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
