On 4/9/07, thad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi List,
Is it possible to split this by reducing the number of physical
extents (PE) for root to the equivalent of 20 GB and re-layout the
other PEs for 3 VGs that will be used for apps and DBs. Can I do this
without wiping the present installation or
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 02:05:43PM +0800, JM Ibanez wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Michael C. Alonzo) writes:
> > (People please don't make this thread an RPM vs. DEB flame thread. I just
> > have a
> > fetish with .debs. That's all. YMMV).
> Personally, I'm more enamored with Apt than .deb, as
Hi,
We are setting up several virtual servers running on Linux OS with VMware
installed. What can you recommend for centralized monitoring tool to check
the performance or utilization rate of each server?
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Maenard
-
"Ability is what you're capable of doing
thad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi List,
Hi! Does the two LVs matter? If so can you also provide us with the sizes of
your 2 LVs?
>
> This will be my first time to deal with LVM in Linux and I have one
> volume group as described below. The project was just handed to me and
> what I need to d
No other reaction but to support the Open Document movement! :)
On Apr 9, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Pablo Manalastas wrote:
Groklaw reports efforts by Microsoft to oppose
California Bill 1668 on the use of Open-XML in state
documents:
http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?
mode=display&sid=2007040612273
Groklaw reports efforts by Microsoft to oppose
California Bill 1668 on the use of Open-XML in state
documents:
http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20070406122736199&title=Microsoft+asking+people+to+write+leters+opposing+California+A.B.+1668+-+Open+Document+Format%2C&type=article&or
Hi List,
This will be my first time to deal with LVM in Linux and I have one
volume group as described below. The project was just handed to me and
what I need to do is reorganize its lay out. I need to split this in 4
volumes, 20 GB for root, 30 GB for apps and 2 x 75GB each for DB.
Is it poss
For the information of everyone, Debian GNU/Linux 4 is officially
releasead. :) Yeabah! Release anouncement is here [1], and you know
the drill, use mirrors[2] to download.
[1] http://www.us.debian.org/News/2007/20070408
[2] http://www.us.debian.org/CD/http-ftp
Noong Huw, Abr 05, 2007 ng 08:16:32AM +0800, sinabi ni Mhac Janapin:
> I'm looking for a way for our intranet offices to collaborate on working on
> some documents (spreadsheets and text documents). I have found O3spaces to
> be a promising one, but their open source version is yet to be released.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Michael C. Alonzo) writes:
> (People please don't make this thread an RPM vs. DEB flame thread. I just
> have a
> fetish with .debs. That's all. YMMV).
Personally, I'm more enamored with Apt than .deb, as although dpkg is
the underlying system, apt(1) is simply awesome --
JM Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sid is indeed unstable, but there is actually a more "unstable"
> branch, more bleeding edge than unstable -- experimental. All totally
> bleeding-edge packages (e.g. completely new upstream versions, new
> software packages) are introduced in experimental b
11 matches
Mail list logo
