ssp has problems with -O3 on some applications. boost regex also shows
problems. for stability and safety, better optimize it with -O2 or lower
specially if you're using gcc or better test it first before compiling
your whole system with -O3 or you can also use another compiler which may
optimize b
On 2018 0, Nelson Serafica wrote:
> The client cannot provide another machine for the pfsense. I'm looking
> on this one http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. This
> is the setup I want to configure
>
> I gonna setup two domain. www.foo.com (PLDT IP) and www.fee.com
> (Bayante
brtfs is still not suitable for generic use for now. the format isn't even
yet finalized. maybe ext4 may be the default in the upcoming fedora.
On 1246 0, jan gestre wrote:
>
>I bet btrfs can even top zfs, fedora is considering it as the default
>filesystem to replace the aging ext3 in
%./test
time_t = 64 bits
%uname
FreeBSD
On 1152 0, fooler mail wrote:
> the only way to test this is to run this simple C code on different
> platforms...
>
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/l
i'm not aware on linux but afaik solaris and freebsd did already
introduce 64bits for time_t.
On 1143 0, "Gideon N. Guillen" wrote:
> -original message-
> From: "Norbert P. Copones"
> Date: 02/11/2009 13:54
>
> > 64-bit apps are not affected by this b
this would affect programs that stored time as signed 32 bit int. 64-bit
apps are not affected by this bug since they use 64-bit int on time_t.
however, 32-bit apps on 64-bit system can be affected.
On 1140 0, Miguel Paraz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Daniel Escasa wrote:
> > As I u
make it
date -r 1234567890
On 1140 0, Silverlokk wrote:
>
>http://www.fsdaily.com/Community/February_13th_UNIX_Time_Will_Reach_12
>34567890 -- links to the /. discussion although I recommend you go to
>the linuxpromagazine article first.
>On my Solaris:
>$ date -d @12345678
though not a linux solution. it can be done on openbsd
sysctl net.inet.ip.multipath=1
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath
cheers!
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Nelson Serafica
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I have client that will changing provider as I stated in my
imo, no patches are available right now. grsec is good, i always
like its rbac. though selinux is in the mainstream kernel, i personally
prefer grsec.
but grsec does not fix the problem. its only a workaround to prevent
write access to kernel memory. the source of the problem should be
fixed. i re
i think the original poster needs carp (common address redundancy
protocol) from the openbsd project.
its not the same situation. carp is simpler than any linux counterpart
looking at the need of the original poster. but i think there's a
linux port of this (ucarp?) but not as stable as the bsd's
this is ot on this mailing list. you can further query bsd related question
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
answering your question: man route(8). btw /etc/netstart has been obsoleted
by /etc/rc.d/* but you can use it to start network by hand.
On 49 0, Nelson Serafica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm
you can simple boot that freebsd disk and use its gmirror(8) tool.
for more info see geom(4), geom(8), and gmirror(8) man pages.
On 39 0, gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would like to clone our hard disk containing FreeBSD OS.
> The hard disk is installed on a PC acting as gateway serv
afaik any of the browser i have used doesn't yet support srv (ie6, firefox,
seamonkey, and opera)
...even curl and wget :-)
On 11 0, Eduardo Tongson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> SRV records are definitely better than multiple A records.
>
> But be careful and test first. Mozilla
this is not linux based solution, however its still opensource :-)
you can use two openbsd box as load balancers via pf and carp as a
redundancy protocol in case one of your "load balancer" goes down.
and combine it with hoststated to monitor the status of your webserver
(in case on of your webse
i tried setting PSIX in LC_ALL, also played w/ LC_* variables. all results
are the same to me. hmm i'll try it on a linux system later.
On Tue, July 31, 2007 9:18 pm, Ludwig Isaac Lim wrote:
> It has something to do with locales
_
Philippine Linux
same result as my first test =)
> Can you try doing something like -
> $ LC_ALL=C sort sample
>
> - and see if there would be any changes
> - I remembered having problems with sort, and putting LC_ALL=C helped.
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (P
On 1 0, Agi Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I'm currently studying using utilities and tools available at the
> terminal. I'm puzzled by sort's behavior. The manual says that it does
> not ignore trailing whitespace when sorting, you'd have to put the -b
> option. However with or without
look at visudo(8) and sudoers(5)
user ALL=/usr/local/bin/sudosh
On 14 0, John Peter Loh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to force sudosh when a user runs sudo?
>
> I understand that the user has to call "sudo sudosh" first. But what I
> want to do is trace all the commands done within
hello,
paanong ubusin ung mga queue? delete ba?
postsuper -d ALL
On 22 0, Nelson Serafica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hi to all,
>Paano po ba magdisable ng incoming sa postfix? I have lot of
>MAILER-DAEMON gusto ko sana wala muna papasok and then ubusin muna ung
>mga queue. I
cvsweb is always available and open. he can always fetch it and compare.
cheers!
On Sat, February 10, 2007 7:23 pm, JM Ibanez wrote:
> "Norbert P. Copones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Sat, February 10, 2007 11:32 am, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>> I
On Sun, February 11, 2007 3:06 am, Ariz Jacinto wrote:
> sorry and no offense to our fellow BSD users (i'am forced to say this)
> but based on your earlier post, it's quite obvious that you're still new
> to the concept of Fake RAID drivers and the difference on the way it
> is encapsulated into th
On Sat, February 10, 2007 11:32 am, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> Wait, so you're saying even the developers consider FreeBSD 5 unstable
> -- but why was it released and given a "stable version release" number
> if that was the case?
freebsd provides 3 trees for users to choose from. 1st is CURREN
oops sorry. i noticed that i replied on your mail only and not on this list.
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: htt
hmm if you've some spare time, can you provide the link of those battery
backed controller? i'm interested on it. thanks.
On Fri, February 9, 2007 11:03 pm, Bopolissimus X Platypus Jr wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 14:23 +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
>> Even with a UPS, as long as there's a h
On Fri, February 9, 2007 5:59 pm, Gideon Guillen wrote:
> On 2/9/07, Norbert P. Copones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> honestly speaking, openbsd does not encourage generic drivers. they even
>
> Huh? So you mean this is not a generic IDE driver for OpenBSD then?
>
> htt
On Fri, February 9, 2007 5:14 pm, Ariz Jacinto wrote:
> if it's proprietary driver, then the development of the driver which
> is intended for a specific model would resort to reverse-engineering
> or some "guess work" because the OEM wouldn't let you take
> a peek on it's complete documentation. t
On Fri, February 9, 2007 5:03 pm, JM Ibanez wrote:
> IN ESSENCE:
>
>* *BSD Fake raid is equivalent to Linux software RAID
>* Fake raid/software RAID =/= hardware RAID
>* Having a generic driver means that you're duplicating:
>
> a) functionality -- you have to essentially fake RAI
On Fri, February 9, 2007 4:11 pm, Ariz Jacinto wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Norbert P. Copones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> and speaking of adaptec? its all about their
>> documentation not that Fake RAID thing. so i can't see any connection
>> b/w the FakeRAID and adapt
On Fri, February 9, 2007 3:35 pm, Ariz Jacinto wrote:
> speaking of Adaptec RAID controllers, you might want to listen
> to an OpenBSD song regarding their frustration with Adaptec
> driver development.
>
> "Hackers of the Lost RAID"
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/songs/song38.mp3
>
> Lyrics:
> in any aspect? does linux have carp? does linux do pfsync? does linux have
> pf? yes it does have iptables. but have you considered comparing the two?
> i have also read a thread in the linux kernel mailing list that linux is
> lagging behind freebsd in terms of wireless drivers. iirc andrew mort
> in any aspect? does linux have carp? does linux do pfsync? does linux have
> pf? yes it does have iptables. but have you considered comparing the two?
> i have also read a thread in the linux kernel mailing list that linux is
> lagging behind freebsd in terms of wireless drivers. iirc andrew mort
On Thu, February 8, 2007 6:58 pm, Ariz Jacinto wrote:
> look, you can't just tweak the filesystem on the other and then leave the
> other on its default! you also have to disable the equivalent feature on
> Ext3 (journalling). =D
i think he uses the same machine on his small benchmark. hmm disab
On Wed, February 7, 2007 9:16 pm, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> I had been developing a C++ application back then which used Berkeley
> DB and had been developing with the target platform being FreeBSD 5. I
> had to check why I was getting extreme corruption rates on the BDB
> databases, and low and
On Mon, January 15, 2007 9:56 am, Tito Mari Francis Escaño wrote:
> This is no flame bait so please answer me objectively. What Linux
> distro is closest to OpenBSD feature-wise.
no flamebait also but imho openbsd != any linux distro or vice versa.
> By features, I mean:
> a) very small footprint
why not create your own ns if pldt's ns are crappy enough?
On Sat, July 15, 2006 7:03 pm, ES DC wrote:
> Thanks for the info guys. I believe they are intentionally blocking it. I
> have 5 sites hosted with the same IP address and only one is not working.
> Hmmm ... maybe I'm just being paranoid. H
pop over smtp, sasl auth, etc. your mileage may vary.
cheers!
On Fri, July 7, 2006 3:23 am, jan gestre wrote:
> On 6/27/06, Allen Umlas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Fellows,
>>
>> Just want to ask, i check my email and i receive spams from my
>> aliases account, ex. [EMAIL PRO
yes. at least it will. specially if your internet server is also your nat
router. even if they're not connecting to gigabit network as gigabit
ethernets have much more advance buffering than 100mbps cards. very useful
especially on state tables.
On Wed, June 7, 2006 3:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
On Tue, May 23, 2006 7:19 pm, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> Hi Norbert!
hello! :-)
> Yeah, it is perhaps quite possible for a uid-0 process to get out of
> the chroot, which is why a chroot must be properly configured in the
> first place, having just the bare metal to run the allowed apps per
> the site'
On Tue, May 23, 2006 6:42 pm, eric draven wrote:
> not too many bugs? * shivers *
i just remember how sudo handles environment variables before that can
easily lead to different escalation privileges :-)
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailin
On Tue, May 23, 2006 6:37 pm, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> True enough, but `sudo' is only as powerful enough as the chroot
> allows it to, uid 0 or not. Fortunately for us, we don't get too many
> bugs on sudo very very often...
uid 0 is uid 0 whether on chroot or not. let's just accept the fact that
is
On Tue, May 23, 2006 5:15 pm, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> OTOH, chroots are quite painful to set up, but are worth the effort if
> your intended users are a bit, erm, well, finicky. I can imaging
> doing a `debootstrap' for getting a Sarge base running on
> /debian-chroot , bind-mounting /home and tmpfs-
On Thu, May 18, 2006 9:38 am, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> On Thursday 18 May 2006 09:27, Norbert P. Copones wrote:
>> my cheap and reliable suggestion:
>>
>> http://www.openbgpd.org
>
> You'd still need to apply for an ASN to use BGP. Whatever solution you may
>
my cheap and reliable suggestion:
http://www.openbgpd.org
cheers :-)
On 5/13/06, Tony Raboza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mga peeps,
>
> Salamat sa lahat ng nag-reply -- laki tulong niyo. Meron din nag-email
> sa
> akin ... ok din suggestion mas simple -- gawin ko daw - 2 router sa 2
> ISP
yes it may be sufficient if you don't keep the distfiles. but sometimes
you should keep the distfiles since some minor version bump occurs on apps
on portage. since it will be a desktop machine, many big apps are on a
desktop machine. in fact my distfiles is more than 7gb now.
i think on his specs
17, 2006 11:22 am, Jay Jesus D. Amorin wrote:
> Norbert P. Copones wrote:
>
>>128mb of ram and all he had to do is compile all the apps. are you
>> serious?
>>
>>
> yup. ;) it still meets the minimum hardware requirement for gentoo, oh
> sorry patience is not an i
128mb of ram and all he had to do is compile all the apps. are you serious?
On Wed, May 17, 2006 10:19 am, Jay Jesus D. Amorin wrote:
> go for gentoo
> _
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
> plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.
On Mon, May 8, 2006 10:45 am, Paul Patrick Carpio Prantilla wrote:
> Hello Kelsey,
>
> awstats has a good history of exploits against it, and it appears to be
> commonly exploited in redhat systems. Unless that's you downloading
> "ping.txt" or "ping" --which is apparently a perl exploit that most
On Thu, April 6, 2006 11:11 am, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> there is no way you can stop p2p. when the packets are all encrypted
> then you are stumped.
>
> You can use the suggested solutions but you cant stop them all. And it
> takes only one guy to successfully connect to any p2p network and hog
>
though not a linux distro but in openbsd, just use:
route add default 192.168.1.1
route add -mpath default 192.168.2.1
route add -mpath default <3rd gateway (if any)>
...and so on and so forth
you can specify as multiple gateway as you want.
> Jay Jesus D. Amorin wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> is it posibl
On Tue, February 7, 2006 12:16 pm, Kenneth Oncinian wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> But the OP is not using PF but IPF If I'm not mistaken :).
no problem on that, kldload pf or include pf on the kernel :-)
_
Philippine L
On Tue, February 7, 2006 11:42 am, Junn wrote:
> ooppss... i mean packets passing thru different ports for a single
> https/ssl session will give you problems.
>
> please correct me if i'm wrong. :-)
any https/ssl/imaps/sftp/tls (etc. etc.) connections on a nat address
pool[1] (e.g. dual dsl) can
> dude, you're in a heck of a problem doing this the way you want it.
> load-balancing is a broader topic than you think it is. for example, you
> have to really consider which port each packet should go thru because if
> you use another port for say an https session, you're in trouble.
as a follo
> Excuse me for my semantics.
>
> Now, what I meant by "proper" is that given a proper security isolation
> that is enforced in the operating system, a virus should be contained
> within the user who ran the executable. A virus is just an executable
> piece of code that has to attach to another bin
> Viruses != Worms
viruses and worms = malware
there's nothing wrong using "viruses/worm" as they're both malwares.
> The computer worm is a program that is designed to copy itself from one
> computer to another over a network. This does not need any human
> intervention.
sometimes human interv
i think this is not the right list to ask such questions. for bsd-related
questions you can subscribe at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi guys!
>
> Im using FREEBSD box as my Linux gateway/fw. Now I want to have a multiple
> DSL connection wherein our network can use it at the same time and should
> avoid d
its true. linux viruses/worms do exist for a long time. even the
contributed korean version of mozilla and thunderbird was found to be
infected by the linux.rst.b virus last september (found by kaspersky lab).
> What do you think of this guys?!
>
> http://www.viruslibrary.com/virusinfo/Worm.Linux
'sudo su' will do fine
> On 1/11/06, Jerome Gotangco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you need root, you can enable it:
> [snipped]
>
> Another way to get a root command line w/o enabling the root account is to
> use:
>
> sudo -S -h
_
Philippin
aside from openvrrpd, you can also use openbsd's carp. there's a userland
implementation of this protocol w/c is known to work on linux (no pfsync
though)
http://www.ucarp.org
>> pwede po bang mag e setup ang mail server for redundancy?possible ba
>> ito?any hint?
>
> Here's a hint:
>
> http://we
even setting execution time to 1000 won't help :-) this is an issue on php
(w/ version 4.4.1) and squirrelmail. the workarounds would be the
following:
1.) downgrade php (not recommended)
2.) enabling server side sorting in your config/config.php
On Wed, November 2, 2005 10:54 pm, jan gestre wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> i got this problem in my postfix mailserver, users can log in to their
> account but when they try to read their emails, all we get is this fatal
> error message, they can't read the contents
> *" Fatal error*: Maximum execution ti
>> On Wed, August 24, 2005 10:26 am, nidhog said:
>> > my openbsd in a 486/66 boots into runlevel 3 at an amazing speed of
>> > 1:47 minutes... heh :) bagal no?
>> >
>> > on a p4 my lfs boots:
>> >
>> > runlevel 3: 47secs
>> > runlevel 5: 1:22mins -- gnome is sloow...
>>
>> AFAIK *bsd don't have a
Zak B. Elep said:
> JM Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> One word: ratpoison.
>
> Another: ion[1].
>
> If you're the type who believes in the notion of a computer desktop
> being an instrumentation panel, and loves xterms *seriously*, then
> there's no beating CLI-friendly WMs like ones the a
looking at the author of article, hey its daniel lyndons (you know what i
mean). its not about openbsd vs linux imho, its about how dan can bash
linux. just look at all his previous articles on linux.
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing L
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -j DNAT -d 10.136.58.7 --dport 80
--to-destination 10.136.57.7
Junix Gaspar said:
> opps made a mistake also,
>
> it should be, People are using 10.136.58.7:80 as the default proxy and
> I would like to REDIRECT it to 10.136.57.7:80
>
> as I have said, I need
ups or should i say...
cache_peer 10.136.57.7 parent 80 0 no-query default
sorry for the mess.
Junix Gaspar said:
> No need for that I think,
>
> People are using 10.136.57.7:80 as the default proxy server
> i have setup a new proxy server this new blade server but the IP is
> 10.136.57.7:80
>
>
you can also use your old squid to forward all request to your new proxy
cache_peer 10.136.58.7 parent 80 0 no-query default
acl localnet src x.x.x.x/x.x.x.x
never_direct allow all
Junix Gaspar said:
> No need for that I think,
>
> People are using 10.136.58.7:80 as the default proxy server
> i h
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#greylist
Mhac Janapin said:
> meron din ba greylisting ang postfix Jops?
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: htt
it's openbsd using the generic kernel :-)
Zak B. Elep said:
> fluxbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Where can I get one for free?
>
> Aside from google, there was an opening for new accounts on spunge.org
> sometime ago, but i believe spunge is not accepting applications right
> now.
>
> There'
68 matches
Mail list logo
