simply put.. compliance is an accordance with established guidelines,
specifications, or legislation... for example.. software being developed in
compliance with specifications created by some standard body... big
companies have chief compliance officer (CCO) to overlook for it... so know
the risks
In his article which opens the Feb 2013 issue of the /ISACA Journal/,
Steven Ross tackles this problem quite insightfully. I like how he
points out that standards which are often referred to as "best practice"
are really "just okay practice". He points out that ISO/IEC 27001 as it
currently stands
This has become an interesting topic :-)
The need to strike the balance with compliance is one thing with security and
nature or type of infrastructure whether its for SOX, PCI, HIPAA, etc etc. And
there a lot more types of compliances not too common because of nature of the
business that are
The author of the thread discussion must be working in an organization
where strict compliance is a must have, like financial or credit card
processing companies. Even MasterCard and VISA require their partners to
comply to such requirements to be certified and graded accordingly as
affiliate.
Howe
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:02 PM, jgotan...@gmail.com
wrote:
> You know very well what you posted is personal opinion and won't make sense
> to any high grade requirement like sox :-)
Maybe. Most likely we're just dealing with different cases. I'm not
saying compliance is a bad thing, but there
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Zak Elep wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:53 PM, jgotan...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zak Elep wrote:
> >>
> >> Time to kick the asses of those "auditors" then :P
> >
> > LOL easier said than done. Compliance is a very powerful bus
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:53 PM, jgotan...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zak Elep wrote:
>>
>> Time to kick the asses of those "auditors" then :P
>
> LOL easier said than done. Compliance is a very powerful business motivator.
Pretty easy when you can demonstrate other busi
Hi Tad,
I feel you when you said "compliance".
Here i am using Kaspersky. It supports redhat workstations and can be
deployed / administered remotely. (via satellite maybe)
http://www.kaspersky.com/anti-virus_linux_workstation
regards,
Kenneth
On 5/29/2013 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
> Hi PLUG
>> I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
>> based AV that can be deployed via Satellite? We spoke to AVG and they only
>> support server, I know it doesn't make sense but compliance require us for
>> vendor support.
>
> Curious as to why you need to run AV t
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zak Elep wrote:
> Time to kick the asses of those "auditors" then :P
LOL easier said than done. Compliance is a very powerful business motivator.
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
http://lists.lin
Ah yeah compliance is PITA, :-)
Anyway, ESET NOD32 looks like they have a client for Linux Desktop, support
major Linux distro.
http://www.eset.com/me/home/products/antivirus-linux/
--
-[ OpenSource, Open Ideas ]-
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zak Elep wrote:
> Time to kick the asses
Hi Zak,
Yup and I know it's doable. But it will takes a brave soul to explain that to
process to "auditors".
Zak Elep wrote:
>On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
>> I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
>> based AV that can be deployed
Time to kick the asses of those "auditors" then :P
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
> Hi Zak,
>
> Yup and I know it's doable. But it will takes a brave soul to explain that to
> process to "auditors".
>
> Zak Elep wrote:
>
>>On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wro
Is it a company policy the auditors using or they have their own
guidelines?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zak Elep wrote:
> Time to kick the asses of those "auditors" then :P
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Thad Mailist
> wrote:
> > Hi Zak,
> >
> > Yup and I know it's doable. But it w
Will ClamAV suffice?
From: Thad Mailist
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2013, 13:46
Subject: [plug] AV for Redhat Workstations
Hi PLUG
I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
> I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
> based AV that can be deployed via Satellite? We spoke to AVG and they only
> support server, I know it doesn't make sense but compliance require us for
> vendor s
Harish,
Like what I said its "compliance" requirement otherwise I will choose Debian
over Redhat :-)
Harish Pillay wrote:
>Tad -
>
>On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
>> Hi PLUG
>>
>> I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
>> based AV t
Tad -
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
> Hi PLUG
>
> I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
> based AV that can be deployed via Satellite? We spoke to AVG and they only
> support server, I know it doesn't make sense but compliance require
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Thad Mailist wrote:
> I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
> based AV that can be deployed via Satellite? We spoke to AVG and they only
> support server, I know it doesn't make sense but compliance require us for
> vendor s
Hi PLUG
I have a big deployment of Red hat workstations. Any recommendation for rpm
based AV that can be deployed via Satellite? We spoke to AVG and they only
support server, I know it doesn't make sense but compliance require us for
vendor support.
Thanks,
Tad
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
