Exactly what I'm doing. Thanks for the validation! =)
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, fooler mail wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle
> wrote:
> > Ah, but my kung fu is not that good. so I'll take a crack at it using
> a
> > tomahawk (apache) =)
> >
> > Th
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle
wrote:
> Ah, but my kung fu is not that good. so I'll take a crack at it using a
> tomahawk (apache) =)
>
> Thanks to all who responded!
forget kungfu.. ill teach you how to use pambansang kamao first :->
dido sevilla already gave yo
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, but my kung fu is not that good. so I'll take a crack at it using a
> tomahawk (apache) =)
>
If your VM supports VDE it might be better to use it. You might not need to
do IPTables and VDE might
le
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 8:05:59
Subject: Re: [plug] NAT+forwarding question
Ah, but my kung fu is not that good. so I'll take a crack at it using a
tomahawk (apache) =)
Thanks to all who responded!
Hi,
I've done this before using IPTables and Apache's proxy_pass,
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, but my kung fu is not that good. so I'll take a crack at it using a
> tomahawk (apache) =)
>
> Thanks to all who responded!
>
>
Ah, but my kung fu is not that good. so I'll take a crack at it using a
tomahawk (apache) =)
Thanks to all who responded!
Johann
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Holden Hao wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
> johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes a
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes after I made my original post I was thinking LVS directors or Apache
> proxying might do it. Not sure what Jan and D3amon mean by DNS. From
> outside all will hostnames will resolve to the same IP,
Johann,
Right, DNS will not really work since port forwarding is one to one
mapping, and not one to many. You will still be hitting the same ip
address on the internal natted IP.
Rafael already mentioned squid/apache as reverse proxy role. That is
one solution. Another alternative is to use a poo
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:33 PM, jan gestre wrote:
> Simplest solution would be to add each VM's hostname and ip address to each
> server's /etc/hosts file.
How does that make the webserver on the VM accessible from the Internet?
Maybe I did not state my requirements clearly. One machine with
Simplest solution would be to add each VM's hostname and ip address to each
server's /etc/hosts file.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes after I made my original post I was thinking LVS directors or Apache
> proxying might do it. Not
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:07:16 +0800
"Johann Vincent Paul Tagle" wrote:
> I know about port forwarding, but is it possible to also forward
> based on actual hostname being accessed? I have a machine with 1
> public address, and I have virtual machines in that box. Currently
> each VM has a specif
Yes after I made my original post I was thinking LVS directors or Apache
proxying might do it. Not sure what Jan and D3amon mean by DNS. From
outside all will hostnames will resolve to the same IP, then what?
Thanks
Johann
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:37 PM, jumbz tayamen wrote:
> LVS director
LVS directors?
Johann Vincent Paul Tagle wrote:
I know about port forwarding, but is it possible to also
forward based on actual hostname being accessed? I have a machine with
1 public address, and I have virtual machines in that box. Currently
each VM has a specific service running (e.g. D
give dns in each .
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know about port forwarding, but is it possible to also forward based on
> actual hostname being accessed? I have a machine with 1 public address, and
> I have virtual machines in th
DNS
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Johann Vincent Paul Tagle <
johannta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know about port forwarding, but is it possible to also forward based on
> actual hostname being accessed? I have a machine with 1 public address, and
> I have virtual machines in that box. Curren
I know about port forwarding, but is it possible to also forward based on
actual hostname being accessed? I have a machine with 1 public address, and
I have virtual machines in that box. Currently each VM has a specific
service running (e.g. DB, webserver, etc) so NAT+port forwarding sufficed.
Bu
16 matches
Mail list logo
