Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Orlando Andico
JNode is not 100% Java compliant, which makes it pretty much useless for my purposes. Like I mentioned in my prior post, I am going to run OC4J on it. Now JNode isn't even production-level, let alone certified. On 8/7/07, Tito Mari Francis Escaño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you'd want to

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Tito Mari Francis Escaño
Maybe you'd want to check this out: http://www.jnode.org/ Hope this helps. Thanks! On 8/7/07, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah I thought about that... 900MB is still pretty hefty considering > I'll just be running a JVM. Oh and OC4J weighs in at a whopping 500MB. > Oops. > > > On

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Pablo Manalastas
How about using the Fedora 7 live CD to install just the minimum packages from the live CD. PMana *** Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I suddenly have the need for a proliferation of Linux boxes (well, virtual machines) so I can test out some cluster software. Unfortunately I don't hav

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Zak B. Elep
"Orlando Andico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I suddenly have the need for a proliferation of Linux boxes (well, > virtual machines) so I can test out some cluster software. > > Unfortunately I don't have that much disk space. 10GB per VM as > demanded by RHEL or CentOS 5 is way too much. Hmm my

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Orlando Andico
Yeah I thought about that... 900MB is still pretty hefty considering I'll just be running a JVM. Oh and OC4J weighs in at a whopping 500MB. Oops. On 8/7/07, Gideon Guillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: .. > How about having a minimal install ala Debian. During the > installation, just uncheck everyt

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Gideon Guillen
On 8/7/07, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suddenly have the need for a proliferation of Linux boxes (well, > virtual machines) so I can test out some cluster software. > > Unfortunately I don't have that much disk space. 10GB per VM as > demanded by RHEL or CentOS 5 is way too much.

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Miguel Paraz
On 8/7/07, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suddenly have the need for a proliferation of Linux boxes (well, > virtual machines) so I can test out some cluster software. > > Unfortunately I don't have that much disk space. 10GB per VM as > demanded by RHEL or CentOS 5 is way too much.

Re: [plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Roger Filomeno
Damn Small Linux (embedded) It's based on Knoppix, works with 128MB USB with 64 MB qemu virtual drive. On 8/7/07, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suddenly have the need for a proliferation of Linux boxes (well, > virtual machines) so I can test out some cluster software. > > Unfor

[plug] What's the smallest RPM-based distribution I can use?

2007-08-07 Thread Orlando Andico
I suddenly have the need for a proliferation of Linux boxes (well, virtual machines) so I can test out some cluster software. Unfortunately I don't have that much disk space. 10GB per VM as demanded by RHEL or CentOS 5 is way too much. I just need something modern enough (e.g. same kernel and gli