From: Prem Vilas Fortran M. Rara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2007 7:44:18 AM
Subject: Re: [plug] mobile 3G and Linux - PH updates
Hi,
Has anyone tried connecting to a SonicWall VPN gateway on a
Hi,
Has anyone tried connecting to a SonicWall VPN gateway on a Smart 3g?
It can authenticate and do provisioning, but I get this error:
Failed to renew the IP address for the virtual interface. The
semaphore timeout period has expired.
It might be that Smart is dropping upstream UDP port 500 & 4
Hey, Ian,
Thank you for this info. I am now getting a smart 3g.
Shae
> You probably -- *most likely* -- can't do torrents or P2P, I think
> (though I haven't tried).
>
> FWIW, I'm using Smart 3G and can check my POP/IMAP mails, SSH to my
> remote servers, and connect to Jabber -- you know, the '
Ahh yes. Multiple-tabbed browsing truly rocks! I just wish I had Multiple
eyes also to see 'em all at the same time. Whoever invented the concept
should be given a Nobel peace prize. The peace of mind that you will be able
to switch tabs for different websites is so convenient!
Now, why on ea
esday, June 12, 2007 9:18:32 AM
Subject: Re: [plug] mobile 3G and Linux - PH updates
Doesn't running another protocol within SSH slow down the connection a notch? I
ain't no networking guru but from my tech support days whenever my users run
encryption on consumer grade routers the
Discussion List
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:22:42 AM
Subject: Re: [plug] mobile 3G and Linux - PH updates
On 6/11/07, Shae Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you JM! How is tsocks different from proxychains?
>
> Any feedback on port restrictions on mobile 3g?
>
Hey, S
"Orlando Andico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> consumer grade routers only have 20- to 30-MHz processors. so
> definitely running encryption will slow things down.
>
> your typical Linux box has a lot of CPU power though. the overhead of
> encryption is tiny. but there still is an overhead, which
On 6/12/07, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Err, not really. The underlying TCP protocol takes care of
> re-transmissions and stuff, so your TCP session "inside" the SSH
> tunnel sees a lossless connection.
I can't remember the exact article where I read it, but this is the
best articl
Err, not really. The underlying TCP protocol takes care of
re-transmissions and stuff, so your TCP session "inside" the SSH
tunnel sees a lossless connection.
The overhead is due to the double-encapsulation and headers.
If you're going to do TCP over UDP tunnels there's a good name for
that: IPSE
On 6/12/07, [C]hicken [G] od <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't running another protocol within SSH slow down the connection a
> notch? I ain't no networking guru but from my tech support days whenever my
> users run encryption on consumer grade routers they complain about slow
> connections. I u
consumer grade routers only have 20- to 30-MHz processors. so
definitely running encryption will slow things down.
your typical Linux box has a lot of CPU power though. the overhead of
encryption is tiny. but there still is an overhead, which will impose
perhaps a 10% to 20% bandwidth penalty.
O
Doesn't running another protocol within SSH slow down the connection a
notch? I ain't no networking guru but from my tech support days whenever my
users run encryption on consumer grade routers they complain about slow
connections. I usually explain to them that it's because encrypting your
connec
On 6/11/07, Shae Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you JM! How is tsocks different from proxychains?
>
> Any feedback on port restrictions on mobile 3g?
>
Hey, Shae:
You probably -- *most likely* -- can't do torrents or P2P, I think
(though I haven't tried).
FWIW, I'm using Smart 3G and can
Thank you JM! How is tsocks different from proxychains?
Any feedback on port restrictions on mobile 3g?
Shae
On 6/11/07, JM Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Shae Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Are there port restrictions (e.g. I want to ssh tunnel or access VPN)?
>
> At least on Smar
"Shae Tan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there port restrictions (e.g. I want to ssh tunnel or access VPN)?
At least on Smart 3G, you can ssh but you can't access some "unfamiliar"
services. For example, the native git protocol is not allowed, so you'll
have to tunnel that somehow. Which, sin
Are there port restrictions (e.g. I want to ssh tunnel or access VPN)?
Shae
_
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug@lists.linux.org.ph (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http
On 10/16/06, Michael Tinsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Incidentally, has anyone here got a any 3G phone to act as a 3G modem for
Linux? With Smart's "P10 for 30 minutes" rate for 3G, we're looking at
having such a setup augment our present WeRoam solution for a WAN backup
line.
I'm a heavy us
We're using PLDT WeRoam, though just the old GPRS/EDGE version. It's installed in an old P3 machine with a PCI-CardBus card. It's running Ubuntu Breezy to connect to WeRoam and act as a firewall+router to the network behind it. We don't encounter problems with it, except for the faint signal on
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Sevilla III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] mobile 3G and Linux - PH updates
I wouldn't recommend this, either, given how relatively
unstable cellular data technology is
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 09:49:35PM +0800, Roberto Verzola wrote:
> Is it possible to set up a website using a visibility account?
Globe Visibility provides private IP addresses and then does NAT. No,
it's not possible to set up a web server using a Globe Visibility
account. I wouldn't recommend th
Is it possible to set up a website using a visibility account?
Obet
Federico Sevilla III wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:05:14PM +0800, GOvvin wrote:
Anyone using PLDT's weroam or Globe's Visibility service in Linux?
Some months back, Dido Sevilla mentioned he's using one. Any one else
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:05:14PM +0800, GOvvin wrote:
> Anyone using PLDT's weroam or Globe's Visibility service in Linux?
>
> Some months back, Dido Sevilla mentioned he's using one. Any one else
> who would like to share their experience with the service or the linux
> compatibility of the dev
Anyone using PLDT's weroam or Globe's Visibility service in Linux?Some months back, Dido Sevilla mentioned he's using one. Any one else who would like to share their experience with the service or the linux compatibility of the devices provided ?
_
P
23 matches
Mail list logo
