Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

Yup, http://barangaywireless.net is one of my inspiration. I've visited the site years ago. However, it seems like the site domain name has expired already when I checked today. Well my test/experiment was a success. I was able to redirect http packets from the wireless side to my home web server.

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Cocoy Dayao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A neighborhood co-op style wifi would be fun. http://web.archive.org/web/20070607165634/http://barangaywireless.net/ -- Ian Dexter R. Marquez http://feeds.iandexter.net/Coredump _

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

On 2/27/08, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it apply even to provinces not covered by Meralco? Well, that is the restriction on WiFi in general. You'll need to apply for a license from the NTC if you'll need to go beyond the restriction, if ever no one else has licensed the 2.4GH

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

Does it apply even to provinces not covered by Meralco? On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Gideon Guillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thats why I thought of redirecting http traffic to this "future site" > > in my old laptop. Now since

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

On 2/27/08, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thats why I thought of redirecting http traffic to this "future site" > in my old laptop. Now since legal issues are already involve here, it > may be best for those who will be connecting whether intentionally or > by serendipity to be f

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

On Feb 27, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Martin Acupanda wrote: > Currently I still don't have internet in our place for the following > reason: > 1. I have to pay additional 4000+ pesos just so I can connect to their > "nearest box" which I don't want to. > 2. My home is far from the nearest transmitter

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

Currently I still don't have internet in our place for the following reason: 1. I have to pay additional 4000+ pesos just so I can connect to their "nearest box" which I don't want to. 2. My home is far from the nearest transmitter of Smart's Smartbro site. I don't want to risk installing a very hi

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

Nothing nasty here. I just want to test/play around whether it will be possible to replicate amateur radio using wifi. On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Ian Dexter R. Marquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are corre

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

as the name itself says, "redirect" - redirect packets to the destination address/host just like the transparent proxy u mentioned, packets from ur network destined for http is redirected to the http proxy. users won't know what's the address of the proxy that ur using. dnat is used when u want to

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

What you want is similar to what a captive portal does. Just look at the scripts used by Linux-based suites that does a captive portal. By the way on the topic of unsecured wifi connections [1]. [1] Ed

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

"Ian Dexter R. Marquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Martin Acupanda wrote: > You are correct. I'd like to capture all http ("web") traffic. In short, you want to intercept all HTTP traffic. Nothing nasty in mind, I hope? ;) Excuse me. But if your neighbors are

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are correct. I'd like to capture all http ("web") traffic. In short, you want to intercept all HTTP traffic. Nothing nasty in mind, I hope? ;) > > Additionally, I saw this from a script for transparent proxy. > ip

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

if your dhcp server hands out your web server's IP address as gateway/router to dhcp clients, then yes, that would work. routing is the key here. On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to do this experiment. I'd like to capture *all web traffic* > a

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

Sir Van! :) You are correct. I'd like to capture all http ("web") traffic. Additionally, I saw this from a script for transparent proxy. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128 What is the difference (or similarity if any) between "-j REDIRECT" above an

Re: [plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

what do you mean by capturing all web traffic? i think this will only direct all HTTP traffics from your network to the destination IP address you specified. On 2/22/08, Martin Acupanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to do this experiment. I'd like to capture *all web traffic* > and dir

[plug] sharing your home website with your neighbors wirelessly

I'd like to do this experiment. I'd like to capture *all web traffic* and direct it all to my web server. This is my network. my home LAN/WIFI Network(subnet#1) > ordinary router/AccessPoint -> my web server(subnet#2) w/ IP based virtual hosting And I found this in the internet :) iptable