Is it true that version 2.6 of the Linksys WAP11 uses hard coded ntp
servers? Is there a way to set this? I have an ntp server on my
network and want to use the local one instead of whatever the WAP11
thinks it should use.
___
PLUG mailing list
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:34:44 -0700
Michael Dexter dex...@ambidexter.com dijo:
Free Geek has approved us for the PLUG Advance Topics meeting. Let's
give this venue a try with a new food model.
Thanks for taking the initiative to get this going. I will be there,
Schlüssel in Hand. Onwärts zur
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:17 -0700, Patrick J. Timlick wrote:
In my Weird Things That Happen experience, one should heed Keith's
cautions and advice when attempting to upgrade Python. Do just as he says,
except replace Perl with Python.
-- Pat
A few problems with this.
1. SpamCannibal and
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Michael C. Robinson
plu...@robinson-west.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:17 -0700, Patrick J. Timlick wrote:
In my Weird Things That Happen experience, one should heed Keith's
cautions and advice when attempting to upgrade Python. Do just as he says,
Probably a stupid question, but if one wanted to find all files with
execute bits set in a folder (find . -executable), and then execute
them, all within a bash script, is there a simple for files in *
loop that would accomplish this?
___
PLUG mailing
yes, but wouldn't it be easier to do that with just find?
find . -executable -exec {} \;
-wes
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Josh Cady josh.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably a stupid question, but if one wanted to find all files with
execute bits set in a folder (find . -executable), and then
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010, Josh Cady wrote:
Probably a stupid question, but if one wanted to find all files with
execute bits set in a folder (find . -executable), and then execute
them, all within a bash script, is there a simple for files in *
loop that would accomplish this?
for F in *; do
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:36:00PM -0700, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
Is it true that version 2.6 of the Linksys WAP11 uses hard coded ntp
servers?
Here, let me Google that for you.
http://www.google.com/search?q=wap11+ntp
First answer is a page entitled, Weird dates and time stamps on old
wes wrote:
yes, but wouldn't it be easier to do that with just find?
find . -executable -exec {} \;
-wes
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Josh Cady josh.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably a stupid question, but if one wanted to find all files with
execute bits set in a folder (find .
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Larry Brigman larry.brig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Patrick J. Timlick
p.j.timl...@ieee.org wrote:
In my Wierd Things That Happen experience, one should heed Keith's
cautions and advice when attempting to upgrade Python. Do just as
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:45:30AM -0700, Larry Brigman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Patrick J. Timlick
p.j.timl...@ieee.org wrote:
In my Wierd Things That Happen experience, one should heed Keith's
cautions and advice when attempting to upgrade Python. Do just as he says,
At the risk of being misunderstood, again, I can confirm that it was not a
jab at Perl.
In fact, I was warning that similar cautions and solutions apply to Python
as those described by Keith for Perl.
-- Pat
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Erik Lane erikl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17,
Finally, someone who understands me.
-- Pat
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Keith Lofstrom kei...@kl-ic.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:45:30AM -0700, Larry Brigman wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Patrick J. Timlick
p.j.timl...@ieee.org wrote:
In my Wierd Things That
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:19:29PM -0700, website reader wrote:
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has built a network source
repository server and upgrades their systems via a LAN, and does NOT
rely upon online updates to speak directly to the client machine.
I do that when I set up a
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 11:34 -0700, Michael Dexter wrote:
Hello,
Free Geek has approved us for the PLUG Advance Topics meeting. Let's
give this venue a try with a new food model.
The new food model will be Randal covered in cold meat.
He will do the Dance of the Seven Veals.
Thanks for the help. The find . -executable -exec '{}' \; works well.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Fred James fredj...@fredjame.cnc.net wrote:
wes wrote:
yes, but wouldn't it be easier to do that with just find?
find . -executable -exec {} \;
-wes
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM,
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Patrick J. Timlick
p.j.timl...@ieee.org wrote:
At the risk of being misunderstood, again, I can confirm that it was not a
jab at Perl.
In fact, I was warning that similar cautions and solutions apply to Python
as those described by Keith for Perl.
Sorry for
17 matches
Mail list logo
