On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:20:02 -0700
John Jason Jordan dijo:
>I killed Firefox. I didn't like its appearance, so I downloaded several
>themes, intending to try them out one at a time. Of course, you have to
>restart Firefox to see the new theme. So I selected one of the themes
>and told Firefox to r
I killed Firefox. I didn't like its appearance, so I downloaded several
themes, intending to try them out one at a time. Of course, you have to
restart Firefox to see the new theme. So I selected one of the themes
and told Firefox to restart. It did not restart. Clicking on the
launch menu item, it
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:12:21 -0700
John Jason Jordan dijo:
First, I managed to update python-mako, and then I discovered the
problem with:
gnome-python2-applet (x86_64)
gnome-python2-desktop (x86_64)
gnome-python2-gnomekeyring (x86_64)
It turns out that there was a gnome-python2 package to creat
And here I am, chasing my way backwards towards a more minimalist desktop...
I suppose its inevitable to want more eyecandy and a better platform to
provide it, but until openGL starts beating DirectX in every possible way
and hardware manufacturers cough up current stable 3d enabled drivers it
see
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:19:25 -0700, Matt McKenzie
wrote:
> Shuttleworth blog:
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
>
> And of course the inevitable /. story and comments:
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/05/137212/Ubuntu-Dumps-X-For-Unity-On-Wayland?from=fb
>
>>From what it sound
I have four python files that Fedora 13 thinks need to be updated:
gnome-python2-applet (x86_64)
gnome-python2-desktop (x86_64)
gnome-python2-gnomekeyring (x86_64)
python-mako (noarch)
Yumex will not update any of them because it complains that they are
incompatible with other packages. So I deci
Shuttleworth blog:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
And of course the inevitable /. story and comments:
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/05/137212/Ubuntu-Dumps-X-For-Unity-On-Wayland?from=fb
>From what it sounds like, he wants to make a more aggressive move for
"mobile devices",
> "Rich" == Rich Shepard writes:
>> This is what /usr/local and /opt are for, and that's why I have
>> both of them on separate partitions. Installing non-distribution
>> stuff into /usr is just tempting fate.
Rich>I've had this discussion with the slackbuilds.org folks and
Rich> they in
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Galen Seitz wrote:
> This is what /usr/local and /opt are for, and that's why I have both of
> them on separate partitions. Installing non-distribution stuff into /usr
> is just tempting fate.
galen,
I've had this discussion with the slackbuilds.org folks and they insist
t
Rich Shepard wrote:
>This assumes that you do not install any applications in /usr/ other than
> what comes on the distribution disks. For many of us, that's not the case.
"It hurts when I do that."
"Don't do that."
This is what /usr/local and /opt are for, and that's why I have both
of them
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Matt McKenzie wrote:
> One of the best ways to go, is to keep a separate partition for /home,
> this way when you do a clean install of the newer version, all your user
> data remains intact. Plus, you can backup your important /etc config
> files to a subdirectory in /home (l
--
Matt M.
LinuxKnight
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:21 AM, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:28:02 -0700
> Russell Senior dijo:
>
> >> "Matt" == Matt McKenzie writes:
> >
> >Matt> IMHO, you get this response because it is the preferred method,
> >Matt> especially if yo
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:28:02 -0700
Russell Senior dijo:
>> "Matt" == Matt McKenzie writes:
>
>Matt> IMHO, you get this response because it is the preferred method,
>Matt> especially if you are more than 2 versions distant from current.
>Matt> Doing an upgrade from N-2 or earlier almost invar
13 matches
Mail list logo
