On 03/26/2011 07:39 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> PHP, the public
> bathhouse orgy of programming languages
that's the funniest (and most apt) description of PHP i've ever seen.
Thanks for the laugh!
Joe Shisei Niski
Portland, Oregon, USA
至誠
I have used libgd for lots of graphics; writing text on images
made by other programs, for example. Big investment. The
library works when dynamically linked, but I get a raft of errors
when I try to statically link it. Still investigating that.
In 2007, the original author Thomas Boutell
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>> On Mar 26, 2011 11:13 AM, "Keith Lofstrom" wrote:
> ... using multiple library versions simultaneously
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:04:59PM -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote:
>> NixOs does much of what you describe, retaining multiple versions
> On Mar 26, 2011 11:13 AM, "Keith Lofstrom" wrote:
... using multiple library versions simultaneously
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:04:59PM -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote:
> NixOs does much of what you describe, retaining multiple versions of a
> library, but I have not yet tried it.
If I understand
Applies for top posting, the device I'm using limits my options :(
NixOs does much of what you describe, retaining multiple versions of a
library, but I have not yet tried it.
-Rogan
On Mar 26, 2011 11:13 AM, "Keith Lofstrom" wrote:
> I am vaguely familiar with the regression testing that goes on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:57:22 -0700 Russell Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:16 PM, Jason Barnett wrote:
>
>> > Personally, I just assume that anyone that I didn't give my address to, and
>> > sends me a message is a scammer.
>> >
>> > Unle
I am vaguely familiar with the regression testing that goes on
with Perl CPAN modules. The Perl community is very test-oriented,
which is one reason they are a pleasure to hang out with. With
most software, it seems that the tools are not available to
automate testing and perform detailed all-ver
No apologies necessary. I for one, knew your were temporarily possessed by
some reactionary demon, and you would soon snap out of it. Glad to have you
back.
-- Pat
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:52:23AM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> > The
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:52:23AM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
...
> 3.6.17 and subsequent security upgrades. I realize that some
> people want the latest and greatest thing. However, they are
> not entitled to make that decision f
On Mar 26, 2011, at 6:10 AM, "Michael C. Robinson"
wrote:
> The headers of the last email I received follow. Anyone see anything
> useful here? I resolved 76.13.13.92 and got what appears to be a yahoo
> address, but I don't think that means anything really.
>
> Return-path:
> X-original-to: d
The headers of the last email I received follow. Anyone see anything
useful here? I resolved 76.13.13.92 and got what appears to be a yahoo
address, but I don't think that means anything really.
Return-path:
X-original-to: dee...@robinson-west.com
Delivered-to: dee...@robinson-west.com
Received
On Mar 25, 2011, at 11:23 PM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> Yes, I'll definitely cut off communication if money is requested. I'm
> wondering if there is a danger though even if money isn't requested?
Usually, the scenario is something where they are in trouble, or they want to
come where you a
The firefox developers, in their reciprocally infinite wisdom,
are pushing Firefox 4, which requires libstdc++.so.6 with
GLIBCXX_3.4.9 . The available libstdc++.i386 0:4.1.2-50.el5
RPM for RHEL 5x, CENTOS 5x, and SL 5x contains only GLIBCXX_3.4.8 .
You can read more about it here:
http://forums
13 matches
Mail list logo
