On Friday, June 24, 2016 04:21:17 PM wes wrote:
> > I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real samba
> > user space mount option available.
>
> As much as I hesitate to spend any time advocating for M$-originated
> technologies, I must say I do not see the challenge
>>
>>
>>
>> I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real
>> samba
>> user space mount option available.
>>
>>
> As much as I hesitate to spend any time advocating for M$-originated
> technologies, I must say I do not see the challenge here. I mount SMB
> shares (from all
>
>
>
> I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real samba
> user space mount option available.
>
>
As much as I hesitate to spend any time advocating for M$-originated
technologies, I must say I do not see the challenge here. I mount SMB
shares (from all walks of OS life)
On Friday, June 24, 2016 02:52:10 PM John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
>
> wes dijo:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
> >>
> >> wes
They're copying the Microsoft business model in the hopes it will work for
them too
-wes
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Denis Heidtmann
wrote:
> Thanks everybody. I now have synaptic, and Gnome-software is hidden. On my
> desktop running 14.04 the equivalent of
Ubuntu Software Center appears to be replaced with Gnome-Software. I was
successful installing Synaptic using it, but it is now relegated to the
not-used pile. I guess I should try to do some uninstalls, but I am
concerned it might take out some things that some still-used sw needs.
BTW, why
Thanks everybody. I now have synaptic, and Gnome-software is hidden. On my
desktop running 14.04 the equivalent of Gnome-software uses the same icon
as Gnome-software, but it works. Why is it that Ubuntu seems to have the
philosophy "If it ain't broke, fix it 'till it is."?
A little bit of
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:52 PM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
> wes dijo:
>
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
> >> wes
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:28:31 -0700
Denis Heidtmann dijo:
>In ubuntu 16.04 the package manager GUI is Gnome-Software. (You would
>not know that just by looking at the name provided by hovering over
>the icon nor by launching it and looking for a help/about menu-none
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:38:47 -0700
wes dijo:
>On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
>> wes dijo:
>>
>> >Most NAS devices support multiple protocols. NFS is relatively rare
>>
It didn't make it into the curated Software Center?
Install Synaptic
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> In ubuntu 16.04 the package manager GUI is Gnome-Software. (You would not
> know that just by looking at the name provided by hovering
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:25 PM, John Jason Jordan
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
> wes dijo:
>
> >Most NAS devices support multiple protocols. NFS is relatively rare
> >these days. I would expect it to support SMB (Windows-style file
>
On any new install, I use the "Ubuntu Software Center" to install Synaptic
as my first action. I don't know why Gnome-Software is so limited... well,
yes I do, I just don't agree with it.
-wes
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Denis Heidtmann wrote:
> In ubuntu
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> Ideally the contents of the drive would be visible in a Thunar window so I
> can just drag and drop files the same as I do with my current USB 3.0
> external drive. It would make my life a lot easier if I don't have to
> access the drive from a
In ubuntu 16.04 the package manager GUI is Gnome-Software. (You would not
know that just by looking at the name provided by hovering over the icon
nor by launching it and looking for a help/about menu-none exists.)
I search for stress in Gnome-Software and get nothing found. Using
apt-cache
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:23:02 -0700
wes dijo:
>Most NAS devices support multiple protocols. NFS is relatively rare
>these days. I would expect it to support SMB (Windows-style file
>sharing) which is supported fairly ubiquitously.
>From the Synology description/features sheet:
16 matches
Mail list logo