On Saturday, June 25, 2016, Dick Steffens wrote:
> I'm typing this on my laptop.
>
> I've just set up my computer after it was off for a couple of weeks. I'm
> installed at a friend's house, so I don't know much about the local
> network except that it's 192.168.1.xxx
>
> > If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with:
> >
> > >>* I'm great, what do you need done?
> > >>* I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering
> > >>* I'm rusty, but could spin up quick
> > >>* Only use it with the man page handy for reference
>
Fair to middling, mostly can find what's needed without searching, but
still regularly search for syntax on advanced matching filters
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, 5:41 PM Dick Steffens wrote:
> On 6/27/2016 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> >> If asked to self assess your
On 6/27/2016 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>> If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with:
>>
>>* I'm great, what do you need done?
>>* I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering
>>* I'm rusty, but could spin up quick
>>* Only use it with the
comfortable
-- filtering on host name/IP, protocol (IP, IPv6, TCP, UDP, ARP
...), port, or MAC address
-- more complex filtering (packet inspection) will require
(man+Google)-Fu
On 6/27/2016 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would
> "chris" == chris (fool) mccraw writes:
chris> somewhere between 2 and 3, but i would refer to the man page for
chris> anything I hadn't done recently. Much like every other unix
chris> utility with more than a handful of flags (eg ls, tar, bash) -
chris> even the ones i
somewhere between 2 and 3, but i would refer to the man page for anything I
hadn't done recently. Much like every other unix utility with more than a
handful of flags (eg ls, tar, bash) - even the ones i use extensively &
daily - I refer to the man page despite familiarity with the tool.
On Mon,
On Jun 27, 2016 10:56 AM, "Michael Rasmussen" wrote:
>
> If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with:
>
> * I'm great, what do you need done?
> * I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering
> * I'm rusty, but could spin up quick
I am right in
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with:
* I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering
* I'm rusty, but could spin up quick
Somewhere between these two, though my filtering chores have tended to
be limited to
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:04:39 -0700
John Jason Jordan dijo:
>I need a NAS system which includes a two-bay enclosure capable of
>holding two 6TB drives, and I want to start out with just one 6TB
>drive.
Thanks again to all for the help and suggestions. Just now I placed an
s/man page/google results for the specific thing I'm trying to do/ <---
this is me.
-wes
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with:
>
> * I'm great, what do you need done?
> * I'm
If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with:
* I'm great, what do you need done?
* I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering
* I'm rusty, but could spin up quick
* Only use it with the man page handy for reference
* tcpwhat?
Back story after a few responses
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 12:26:59 PM wes wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> wrote:
> > On Friday, June 24, 2016 04:21:17 PM wes wrote:
> > > > I do not see too many positives for using SMB on linux, without real
> >
> > samba
> >
> > > >
Is this linux forum? Did I miss something?
On Friday, June 24, 2016 11:20:26 PM r...@dimstar.net wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Tomas Kuchta
> > wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering - Would you share how do you mount SMB in user space?
> > I mean mount not type
On 6/25/16 4:41 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:47:18PM -0500, Louis Kowolowski wrote:
>>> Regarding XFS, why would you need ways to zero out data? I
>>> thought the whole point was to keep the data…isn’t that why we’re
>>> storing it? I mean…srsly.
> To prevent those
15 matches
Mail list logo