On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> > "Denis" == Denis Heidtmann writes:
>
> Denis> This is a recent install, so I expect that there may not be many
> Denis> kernels. How do I see what older kernels I have?
>
> I use aptitude for package management. Look for packages n
To see the real truth run these two commands:
awk -V
gawk -V
I suspect that you will get the same GNU Awk in both instances.
Tomas
On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 08:16 -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
>I was curious whether awk is a soft link to gawk on my Slackware
> systems
> so I checked. They are two s
> "Denis" == Denis Heidtmann writes:
Denis> This is a recent install, so I expect that there may not be many
Denis> kernels. How do I see what older kernels I have?
I use aptitude for package management. Look for packages named
linux-image-* and the associated linux-image-extra-*. You wan
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Denis Heidtmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Russell Senior > wrote:
>
>> > "Denis" == Denis Heidtmann writes:
>>
>> Denis> Seems like initramfs ran into a memory limit. I really do not
>> Denis> know what this is about, but poking around t
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> > "Denis" == Denis Heidtmann writes:
>
> Denis> Seems like initramfs ran into a memory limit. I really do not
> Denis> know what this is about, but poking around the web gives me the
> Denis> idea that an upgrade was attempted but did
> "Denis" == Denis Heidtmann writes:
Denis> Seems like initramfs ran into a memory limit. I really do not
Denis> know what this is about, but poking around the web gives me the
Denis> idea that an upgrade was attempted but did not have room. A bug
Denis> report indicated that initramfs-tool
Seems like initramfs ran into a memory limit. I really do not know what
this is about, but poking around the web gives me the idea that an upgrade
was attempted but did not have room. A bug report indicated that
initramfs-tools does not check for memory sufficiency:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> The realpath utility is good for that:
Paul,
Kewel tool. Thanks!
Carpe weekend,
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>> You're still seeing only the symlinks. At some point, you'll hit real
>> files. What does
>> ls -l /bin/*awk*
>> show?
>
> Finally reached bottom:
>
> $ ls -l /bin/*awk*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> You're still seeing only the symlinks. At some point, you'll hit real
> files. What does
> ls -l /bin/*awk*
> show?
Finally reached bottom:
$ ls -l /bin/*awk*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar 9 2014 /bin/awk -> gawk*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>> What does "ls -l /bin/*awk" give you?
>
> Paul,
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar 9 2014 /bin/awk -> gawk*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Mar 9 2014 /bin/gawk -> gawk-4.1.0*
You're still seeing only the sym
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> What does "ls -l /bin/*awk" give you?
Paul,
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar 9 2014 /bin/awk -> gawk*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Mar 9 2014 /bin/gawk -> gawk-4.1.0*
Wonder why I get different results when queried individually. So both are
gawk.
Th
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>> Are they separate binaries, or are they hard-linked (rather than
>> symlinked)?
>
> Paul,
>
> Appear to be separate binaries:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Mar 9 2014 /usr/bin/awk -> ../../bin/awk*
> lrw
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> Are they separate binaries, or are they hard-linked (rather than symlinked)?
Paul,
Appear to be separate binaries:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Mar 9 2014 /usr/bin/awk -> ../../bin/awk*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Mar 9 2014 /usr/bin/gawk -> ../../b
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Rich Shepard wrote:
I was curious whether awk is a soft link to gawk on my Slackware systems
so I checked. They are two separate binaries. Since awk is apparently not
the same as gawk, what version of awk does it represent?
Are they separate binaries, or are they hard-link
On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Larry Brigman wrote:
> I suspect that they are supplied by the same package. Awk would be
> compiled with the --traditional option as embedded default.
Larry,
I wondered if that is the case. I suppose that traditional awk limits
would be needed if one had a dusty old awk
I suspect that they are supplied by the same package. Awk would be compiled
with the --traditional option as embedded default. Gawk can revert to that
mode when supplying that option on the command line.
On Nov 18, 2016 8:21 AM, "Rich Shepard" wrote:
I was curious whether awk is a soft link
I was curious whether awk is a soft link to gawk on my Slackware systems
so I checked. They are two separate binaries. Since awk is apparently not
the same as gawk, what version of awk does it represent?
It's interesting that 'man awk' displays the gawk man page.
A curious mind wants to kno
The osm was working until I inadvertently changed it to hdmi, then it
stopped. I plan on looking for a used monitor later this AM. This laptop
supports an external monitor. Need to get a cable.
Thanks,
-Denis
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Michael Barnes
wrote:
> Just curious. If there is n
Just curious. If there is no OSD, how do you know HDMI input is selected?
Also, do you have another computer or laptop or Raspberry Pi or Roku or
something you can hook up to the monitor to see if it is working? You
should get an OSD even with nothing connected to the monitor. So far,
everything yo
20 matches
Mail list logo
