Re: [PLUG] Fixing incorrect hard link count in /proc/fs

2017-06-19 Thread Rich Shepard
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Robert Citek wrote: > The underlying issue is likely with find and/or the kernel versions. > However, you can work around that in a couple of ways. > You probably don't need to search the /proc/ pseudo-filesystem for > qemu files. So here's a way to skip it: ... Thanks

Re: [PLUG] Fixing incorrect hard link count in /proc/fs

2017-06-19 Thread Robert Citek
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jun 2017, Robert Citek wrote: > >> Can you post the syntax of your find command? > > Robert, > > # find / -name qemu > > includes this: > > find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for `/proc/fs' (saw only st_nlink=6 > but already s

Re: [PLUG] Fixing incorrect hard link count in /proc/fs

2017-06-18 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017, Robert Citek wrote: > Can you post the syntax of your find command? Robert, # find / -name qemu includes this: find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for `/proc/fs' (saw only st_nlink=6 but already saw 4 subdirectories): this may be a bug in your file system driver. Aom

Re: [PLUG] Fixing incorrect hard link count in /proc/fs

2017-06-18 Thread Robert Citek
Can you post the syntax of your find command? Regards, - Robert On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: >My Dell Latitude E5410 runs Slackware-14.2/x86_64. Running the 'find' > command produces an error that the hard link count in /proc/fs is incorrect. > There are more details

[PLUG] Fixing incorrect hard link count in /proc/fs

2017-06-18 Thread Rich Shepard
My Dell Latitude E5410 runs Slackware-14.2/x86_64. Running the 'find' command produces an error that the hard link count in /proc/fs is incorrect. There are more details but I don't know that they matter in fixing the problem. Please suggest how this can be fixed. Rich _