On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
> The procmail issue is very specific; apparently it affects only messages
> addressed to me at my business domain.
I can confirm that this is the case. Adding a procmail recipe to place
business mail in my personal folder has produced messages that o
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I just now added me to the group 'mail'.
This has nothing to do with the problem. I sent a test message from my
personal domain to my business domain; it ended up in the mbox file for the
former.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | I
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Jason Dagit wrote:
> It sounds like procmail is doing the right thing and has been for a long
> time.
The procmail issue is very specific; apparently it affects only messages
addressed to me at my business domain. The vanishing messages from gte.net,
a company with its own
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Jason Dagit wrote:
> I haven't read this thread closely, but from what I have seen I don't
> know the solution. Your setup is somewhat complex with the various
> layers.
Yeah. It goes Postfix -> Procmail -> mail folder.
> It sounds like procmail is doing the right thing a
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jason Dagit wrote:
>
>> Oh my. You still use mbox?
>
> Jason,
>
> That's apparently the default with pine/alpine. It's worked for a dozen
> years, and seems appropriate since I use the same box as both the (mail)
> serve
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, drew wymore wrote:
> Here's a blob for converting mbox to maildir.
> http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/mb2md/
Drew,
Thank you. I need to make time to learn what might break if I make this
change. I'm sure there are other components that would need to be changed,
to
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jason Dagit wrote:
>
> > Oh my. You still use mbox?
>
> Jason,
>
> That's apparently the default with pine/alpine. It's worked for a dozen
> years, and seems appropriate since I use the same box as both the (mail)
> serv
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jason Dagit wrote:
> Oh my. You still use mbox?
Jason,
That's apparently the default with pine/alpine. It's worked for a dozen
years, and seems appropriate since I use the same box as both the (mail)
server and my workstation. If there's a smooth transition to maildir, I'
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> It would take a few seconds to do the test.
> Do it.
Michael,
From ~/.pinerc:
# Path of (local or remote) INBOX, e.g. ={mail.somewhere.edu}inbox
# Normal Unix default is the local INBOX (usually /usr/spool/mail/$USER).
inbox-path=/var/spool/mai
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 06:03:23PM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
>Here's ~/.procmailrc:
>
> # set to yes when debugging
> VERBOSE=3
>
> # Remove ## when debugging; set to no if you want minimal logging; to all
> # for max.
> LOGABSTRACT=all
>
>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, drew wymore wrote:
>
>> Does anything show up in /var/log/maillog?
>
> Yes. That's how I know that postfix received the message and passed it to
> procmail.
>
>> Since it's in mbox format you should be able to cat the ma
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:16:54AM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> > Since it's in mbox format you should be able to cat the mailbox and grep
> > for the message by sender/subject since you know what they are. Maybe it's
> > an MUA issue and not the MTA which is unlikely but possible.
>
>I don't
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, drew wymore wrote:
> Does anything show up in /var/log/maillog?
Yes. That's how I know that postfix received the message and passed it to
procmail.
> Since it's in mbox format you should be able to cat the mailbox and grep
> for the message by sender/subject since you kno
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
>
> > well, you could post your procmailrc here and tell us all that you know
> > about a message that disappears (sender, subject, and anything else that
> > might be affected by whatever filter
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
> well, you could post your procmailrc here and tell us all that you know
> about a message that disappears (sender, subject, and anything else that
> might be affected by whatever filter rules you have in place in procmial).
Chris,
Here's ~/.pr
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 16:52, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Last week I asked for ideas on where incoming mail went after postfix
> found the incoming connection. I discovered that the messages were passed
> from qmgr to /usr/bin/procmail but they never showed up in my inbox.
>
> I found and signed u
Last week I asked for ideas on where incoming mail went after postfix
found the incoming connection. I discovered that the messages were passed
from qmgr to /usr/bin/procmail but they never showed up in my inbox.
I found and signed up for a procmail mail list and posted a query there on
what
17 matches
Mail list logo
