Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-28 Thread Tim
> That is certainly an issue. On the other hand: > > free: > total used free sharedbuffers cached > Mem: 3114664 7948562319808 0 57404 404636 > -/+ buffers/cache: 3328162781848 > Swap: 4032304 04032304

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-28 Thread Ronald Chmara
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:47:43PM -0700, Tim wrote: >> I haven't read the entire (verbose) thread on this topic, but one >> thing I'd like to point out if someone else hasn't: >> >> Using multiple versions of the same library across multip

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-27 Thread Keith Lofstrom
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:47:43PM -0700, Tim wrote: > I haven't read the entire (verbose) thread on this topic, but one > thing I'd like to point out if someone else hasn't: > > Using multiple versions of the same library across multiple > applications costs you more than disk space. It also cos

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-27 Thread Tim
> In such an environment, why the heck do we design the loader > to require the use the same version of libfoo for every > application on the system? Why not keep a disk copy of every > version of libfoo ever needed by any code ever run on the > system? /usr/lib takes up about 2GB on my system -

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-27 Thread chris (fool) mccraw
On Mar 26, 2011 2:51 PM, "Rogan Creswick" wrote: > Building static binaries is the best solution I'm aware of at the > moment, and clearly not an option at all for many, many things. ...but it does sound like a good solution for the programs keith himself writes! You could Get a little fancier

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-26 Thread Rogan Creswick
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: >> On Mar 26, 2011 11:13 AM, "Keith Lofstrom" wrote: > ... using multiple library versions simultaneously > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:04:59PM -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote: >> NixOs does much of what you describe, retaining multiple versions

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-26 Thread Keith Lofstrom
> On Mar 26, 2011 11:13 AM, "Keith Lofstrom" wrote: ... using multiple library versions simultaneously On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 01:04:59PM -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote: > NixOs does much of what you describe, retaining multiple versions of a > library, but I have not yet tried it. If I understand

Re: [PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-26 Thread Rogan Creswick
Applies for top posting, the device I'm using limits my options :( NixOs does much of what you describe, retaining multiple versions of a library, but I have not yet tried it. -Rogan On Mar 26, 2011 11:13 AM, "Keith Lofstrom" wrote: > I am vaguely familiar with the regression testing that goes on

[PLUG] Regression Testing and library versions

2011-03-26 Thread Keith Lofstrom
I am vaguely familiar with the regression testing that goes on with Perl CPAN modules. The Perl community is very test-oriented, which is one reason they are a pleasure to hang out with. With most software, it seems that the tools are not available to automate testing and perform detailed all-ver