Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

Rusty but could spin up with some man page work and google-fu. Never did much beyond pretty simple captures though. Drew On Monday, June 27, 2016, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: > > * I'm great, what do

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

I'm rusty, but could spin up quick with man pages and Google I used it for network issue debug quite a lot ages ago. I'm not sure what it says about me or the level of encrypted traffic, but I managed to avoid networking issues calling for the use of tcpdump in the last number of years. T >

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

> > > If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: > > > > >>* I'm great, what do you need done? > > >>* I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering > > >>* I'm rusty, but could spin up quick > > >>* Only use it with the man page handy for reference >

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

Fair to middling, mostly can find what's needed without searching, but still regularly search for syntax on advanced matching filters On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, 5:41 PM Dick Steffens wrote: > On 6/27/2016 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > >> If asked to self assess your

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

On 6/27/2016 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: >> If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: >> >>* I'm great, what do you need done? >>* I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering >>* I'm rusty, but could spin up quick >>* Only use it with the

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

comfortable -- filtering on host name/IP, protocol (IP, IPv6, TCP, UDP, ARP ...), port, or MAC address -- more complex filtering (packet inspection) will require (man+Google)-Fu On 6/27/2016 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

> "chris" == chris (fool) mccraw writes: chris> somewhere between 2 and 3, but i would refer to the man page for chris> anything I hadn't done recently. Much like every other unix chris> utility with more than a handful of flags (eg ls, tar, bash) - chris> even the ones i

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

somewhere between 2 and 3, but i would refer to the man page for anything I hadn't done recently. Much like every other unix utility with more than a handful of flags (eg ls, tar, bash) - even the ones i use extensively & daily - I refer to the man page despite familiarity with the tool. On Mon,

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

On Jun 27, 2016 10:56 AM, "Michael Rasmussen" wrote: > > If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: > > * I'm great, what do you need done? > * I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering > * I'm rusty, but could spin up quick I am right in

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, Michael Rasmussen wrote: If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: * I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering * I'm rusty, but could spin up quick Somewhere between these two, though my filtering chores have tended to be limited to

Re: [PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

s/man page/google results for the specific thing I'm trying to do/ <--- this is me. -wes On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: > > * I'm great, what do you need done? > * I'm

[PLUG] Show of hands/poll on tcpdump

If asked to self assess your tcpdump comfort level would you reply with: * I'm great, what do you need done? * I'm comfortable, can do capture with filtering * I'm rusty, but could spin up quick * Only use it with the man page handy for reference * tcpwhat? Back story after a few responses