On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:28:29AM -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> There may be a similar SL6 porting hack for Chromium. Is the
> open source version of Chromium Adobe flash compatible?
Yes. Though I see Privacy Badger blocks most Flash due to the
server requests that happen.
--
Michae
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 09:48:04PM -0800, Randy Stapilus wrote:
> Not a solution exactly, but I've largely switched over to Chrome for
> exactly that reason. No more nags.
Thanks, Randy. Though Google does not support Chrome on my main
distro (Scientific Linux 6.6), I was able to get it running w
type about:config in the firefox browser.
On 12/30/2015 09:48 PM, Randy Stapilus wrote:
> Not a solution exactly, but I've largely switched over to Chrome for
> exactly that reason. No more nags.
>
> Randy Stapilus
> Ridenbaugh Press
> www.ridenbaugh.com
> WA, OR, ID Weekly Briefings
> 503-852-0
Not a solution exactly, but I've largely switched over to Chrome for
exactly that reason. No more nags.
Randy Stapilus
Ridenbaugh Press
www.ridenbaugh.com
WA, OR, ID Weekly Briefings
503-852-0010
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Keith Lofstrom
wrote:
> About 4 times a year, a new insecurity is
About 4 times a year, a new insecurity is discovered in Adobe Flash
player, and Firefox demands an update. Until that happens, every
flash video requires a click to enable it. The big problem is,
even if the flash player is automatically updated by the distro,
~/.mozilla/pluginreg.dat doesn't get
