Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-02 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 1 May 2013, Keith Lofstrom wrote: I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, with vim-enabled constructs like CO₂ and E = ½mv² . How many of you can read those? One. In alpine set to utf-8. +1, also in Alpine. (Honest

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-02 Thread Joe Niski
On 2013-05-01 5:16 PM, "Richard C. Steffens" wrote: >On 05/01/2013 04:24 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: >>I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, >>with vim-enabled constructs like CO₂ and E = ½mv² . >> >>How many of you can read those? > >Looks like carbon dioxide, and E equ

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-02 Thread Aaron Burt
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 07:32:28PM -0700, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 04:24:43PM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > > I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, > > with vim-enabled constructs like CO₂ and E = ½mv² . > > > How many of you can read those?

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 04:24:43PM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, > with vim-enabled constructs like CO₂ and E = ½mv² . > How many of you can read those? mutt does fine. like always. -- Michael Rasmussen, Portland O

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Dale Snell
On Wed, 1 May 2013 16:24:43 -0700 Keith Lofstrom wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 08:02:26AM -0700, John Jason Jordan wrote: > ... > > was even more curious was a mystery glyph in the subject line: "’." > > From the context the glyph was intended to by an apostrophe. This > > glyph > ... > > I u

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Richard C. Steffens
On 05/01/2013 04:24 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, > with vim-enabled constructs like CO₂ and E = ½mv² . > > How many of you can read those? Looks like carbon dioxide, and E equated with one half of m v squared on Thunderbird on Ubuntu

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Keith Lofstrom wrote: > I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, > with vim-enabled constructs like CO₂ and E = ½mv² . > > How many of you can read those? One. In alpine set to utf-8. Rich ___ PLUG mailin

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Keith Lofstrom
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 08:02:26AM -0700, John Jason Jordan wrote: ... > was even more curious was a mystery glyph in the subject line: "’." > From the context the glyph was intended to by an apostrophe. This glyph ... I use a lot more than ordinary keyboard characters in my emails, with vim-enabl

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 1 May 2013, John Jason Jordan wrote: > The text was interesting, but to me what was even more curious was a > mystery glyph in the subject line: "?." From the context the glyph was > intended to by an apostrophe. This glyph did not render in Claws Mail. John, I see a lot of these type

Re: [PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread Jim Garrison
On 5/1/2013 8:02 AM, John Jason Jordan wrote: [snip] > 00 > 92 That looks like a Windows CP1252 apostrophe. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252 The document is not UTF-8, regardless of what the header says. -- Jim Garrison (j...@acm.org) PGP Keys at http://www.jhmg.net RSA 0x04B73B7F

[PLUG] Unicode mystery

2013-05-01 Thread John Jason Jordan
As I read my mail this morning there are a couple posts to Plug-Talk by Russell regarding FCC chairs. The text was interesting, but to me what was even more curious was a mystery glyph in the subject line: "’." From the context the glyph was intended to by an apostrophe. This glyph did not render i