"chris (fool) mccraw" writes:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27, frankhunt wrote:
>
>> Does the "at" scheduler use bash or dash?
>
> mine (ubuntu 10.4 still) uses /bin/sh as documented in the first line of the
> at(1) man page. on my system, /bin/sh is linked to dash rather than bash.
> i believe
frankhunt wrote:
> Does the "at" scheduler use bash or dash?
>
> I have a shell script that runs just fine via cron or command line
> It generates errors if run via "at" and does not complete
> The errors seem to be related to the use of the "let" statement
> My test script fails the same way from
I finally actually read the first part of the man page for at and found
the reference to /bin/sh.
Duh.
I'll give the single line that calls the real script a try . . .
thanks.
On 10/25/2010 11:53 AM, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27, frankhunt wrote:
>> Does the "at" s
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:27, frankhunt wrote:
> Does the "at" scheduler use bash or dash?
mine (ubuntu 10.4 still) uses /bin/sh as documented in the first line
of the at(1) man page. on my system, /bin/sh is linked to dash rather
than bash. i believe there have been other conversations on her
Does the "at" scheduler use bash or dash?
I have a shell script that runs just fine via cron or command line
It generates errors if run via "at" and does not complete
The errors seem to be related to the use of the "let" statement
My test script fails the same way from command line if I include #!
