On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:48 -0700, Erik R. Jensen wrote:
> The company I work for is in the process of finding an identity management
> solution that suits our needs. It has come down to two options. Option #1
> is to go with IBM, using their IBM Directory Server, Tivoli Access
> Manager, Tivoli Id
Just a crazy site that makes use of Java. I thought you all might
appreciate it:
http://babynamewizard.com/namevoyager/lnv0105.html
Gabe
.===.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
`=
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:02 -0700, Kyle Robinson wrote:
> You've already got AD, so you could use VAS (http://vintela.com) for
> your Unix and Linux systems, VSJ for the J2EE app servers. Best
> practice now days is to standardize on a primary identity store for as
> many platforms as possible. U
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:37 -0700, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
> Why aren't all the dependencies packaged with the source? This would
> seem to be a good solution to me. Maybe back in the day when Internet
> connections were slow it made sense to separate things, but now with
> high speed they cou
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:37:37PM -0700, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
> Michael L Torrie wrote:
> >To summarize. The problem is DLL hell and how package managers deal
> >with multiple versions of share libraries (can you install libtiff-1 and
> >libtiff-2 simultaniously?). These are solvable problems
Michael L Torrie wrote:
To summarize. The problem is DLL hell and how package managers deal
with multiple versions of share libraries (can you install libtiff-1 and
libtiff-2 simultaniously?). These are solvable problems. I must say,
though, that with nice repositories specific to my distro out
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 12:00 -0700, David Smith wrote:
> Now, not to open a can of flames, but this is a point that I think the
> Linux community needs to work on. I can run a game on Windows XP that was
> initially written for Windows 3.1. We're talking complete with sound and
> video. Now that's p
> You've already got AD, so you could use VAS (http://vintela.com) for
> your Unix and Linux systems, VSJ for the J2EE app servers. Best
> practice now days is to standardize on a primary identity store for as
> many platforms as possible. Unix, Linux, j2ee and Windows systems can
> all use AD w
You've already got AD, so you could use VAS (http://vintela.com) for
your Unix and Linux systems, VSJ for the J2EE app servers. Best
practice now days is to standardize on a primary identity store for as
many platforms as possible. Unix, Linux, j2ee and Windows systems can
all use AD with a few a
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:00 -0700, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:48 -0700, Erik R. Jensen wrote:
> > The company I work for is in the process of finding an identity
> > management
> > solution that suits our needs. It has come down to two options.
>
> Sorry I don't have anyth
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:48 -0700, Erik R. Jensen wrote:
> The company I work for is in the process of finding an identity
> management
> solution that suits our needs. It has come down to two options.
Sorry I don't have anything to offer here.
This doesn't answer your question but why was Novell
The company I work for is in the process of finding an identity management
solution that suits our needs. It has come down to two options. Option #1
is to go with IBM, using their IBM Directory Server, Tivoli Access
Manager, Tivoli Identity Manager. Option #2 is to go with Sun using Sun
Directory E
A friend just gave me his old Compaq Presario 1247 Laptop (AMD-K6,
400mhz, 160 mbRAM) which is a huge upgrade from my IBM Thinkpad 310ED
(P1 133 mhz, 64 mb RAM) so I'm pleased. Hand-me-downs are nice.
Anyway, over the weekend I did a HD install of Knoppix on the
Compaq. Each time I start X the
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 11:34 -0700, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
> How compatible are RPMs? Will an RPM listed for Suse 9.1 work with Suse
> 9.2? Or how about for 7.2?
I'm running 9.2 and found that most RPMs for 9.1 worked on 9.2 as well.
> Will an RPM made for Mandrake work for Suse? Will an RPM
Hello All,
How would I go about recovering deleted files through ssh? What
tools can I upload to do this for me? I have no physical access to the
server, so everything is done through ssh and scp. I'm not sure what cmd was
executed to delete the files as it appears the server was hacked.
Bryan Sant wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:15:29 -0700, Kenneth Burgener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although setting "security=user" does make it so I can specify a user,
it also disables the general guest browsing as well. If I try to browse
to "\\linux" it asks for a password, same with if I try to
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:03:51 -0700, Mike Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's not a clear answer as to if/when it will be included in the J2EE
> specification but you can already use it with Tomcat and any other
> compliant Java web container. It just doesn't come "out of the box"
> with any
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:15:29 -0700, Kenneth Burgener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although setting "security=user" does make it so I can specify a user,
> it also disables the general guest browsing as well. If I try to browse
> to "\\linux" it asks for a password, same with if I try to access the
> How compatible are RPMs? Will an RPM listed for Suse 9.1 work with Suse
> 9.2? Or how about for 7.2?
>
> Will an RPM made for Mandrake work for Suse? Will an RPM work on any
> system that has the same kernel version?
It mostly depends on the program inside the RPM. The RPM format is well
def
How compatible are RPMs? Will an RPM listed for Suse 9.1 work with Suse
9.2? Or how about for 7.2?
Will an RPM made for Mandrake work for Suse? Will an RPM work on any
system that has the same kernel version?
Thanks,
Kenneth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.===.
| This has
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:14 -0700, Barry Roberts wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:26:14AM -0700, Mike Heath wrote:
> >
> > If you're looking to implement a multi-tier system with PHP, you should
> > also check out JSR 223 ( http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=223 ).
> >
> > It's still in early a
On Monday 14 February 2005 08:45 am, Hans Fugal wrote:
> This is an old, popular laptop and so it's no surprise that it works
> very well. I know newer laptops can be a real pain to get working 100% in
> any flavor of linux.
The surprising thing, is this has actually worked almost the entire time
On Sunday 13 February 2005 10:45 pm, Hans Fugal wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 at 18:56 -0700, Dave Smith wrote:
> > Yes, comparing a 5-year old release to a 5-week old one is not fair in
> > my view.
> _However_, this laptop is older. It came with Windows 98, and so Windows
> 2000 was newer than the
nikhil d purwant wrote:
hi guys
can anybody tell me what does the makefile do
and also is there some specified format of the same
and any pointers to learn more about makefile
thanks in advance
-nikhil
Here are some suggestions:
Google: L
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 at 08:20 -0700, David Smith wrote:
>
>
> > In any case, my point was that we are now at least to the point windows
> > was 5 years ago. 5 years ago many people would have laughed at the very
> > idea.
>
> Now there's a comment I can agree with, and no, Gabe, my previous comme
On Monday 14 February 2005 08:12 am, nikhil d purwant wrote:
> hi guys
>
>can anybody tell me what does the makefile do
> and also is there some specified format of the same
> and any pointers to learn more about makefile
make implements a dependency graph, and allows you to supply
rules that
> In any case, my point was that we are now at least to the point windows
> was 5 years ago. 5 years ago many people would have laughed at the very
> idea.
Now there's a comment I can agree with, and no, Gabe, my previous comment
was not tongue-in-cheek. :P In fact, I'm writing this email in Ubu
hi guys
can anybody tell me what does the makefile do
and also is there some specified format of the same
and any pointers to learn more about makefile
thanks in advance
-nikhil
.===.
| This has been a P
>I suggest you try XP on the laptop. Up until recently I had a pentium 3
>700mhz laptop. XP ran considerably faster than 2000.
IMO, the most significant difference between w2k and xp on a laptop is the
bootup/restoration times. w2k bootup/restore took eons - they definitely
fixed it up on xp,
Many people still slap on windows 2000, although I agree XP is more
common nowdays.
_However_, this laptop is older. It came with Windows 98, and so Windows
2000 was newer than the laptop or at least contemporary. I wouldn't
dream of XP on it because XP would be too slow.
I suggest you try XP
Hi All,
I am not heavy user of linux. But I am using it since last few
years. I am not sysadmin or such user, uses my linux box to improve fluency in
Sybase environment (Sybase DBA 4 years) Also consultant for known Sybase users
;)
Sybase is proving free version of its database s
31 matches
Mail list logo
