On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Bryan Sant wrote:
On 6/28/06, Hans Fugal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also not very good at enterprise-level performance testing/
thinking,
but I'll venture that insofar as rails is not hindered by the ruby
threads implementation it's by working around the
Pluggers,
Linux Networx is building some of the fastest most reliable
supersystems in the world and we are adding several positions. You can
check out our website at www.lnxi.comI also cut and pasted 2 ads below
that will be added to the website in the next day or two.
Integration Engineer
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 at 18:13 -0600, Bryan Sant wrote:
On 6/28/06, Hans Fugal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 at 16:53 -0600, Bryan Sant wrote:
I'll give you that Java is fast enough once started, but startup time is
abysmal.
What version of Java are you running? The 1.5 JVM
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 at 21:01 -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
As far as the benefits of an IDE (like Eclipse), I'll second the notion
that you just have to see it in action. I'm not sure what exactly emacs
can do, but vim can't hop through a dozen files following the flow of code
execution just by
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:26:57PM -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
I know Emacs has this facility; it's called etags. I thought there was
support for tags in vim, and possibly for good old vi.
xrefactory (http://www.xref-tech.com/xrefactory-java/main.html) is
closer to what eclipse has than etags.
Just a little reminder about the July Plug meeting.
PLUG co-founder Thayne Harbaugh will be presenting on the Realm Systems
iDentity devices.
A mobile, personal server: 400 MHz powerpc, 128 MiB memory, 1 GiB
storage, biometric finger-print reader, USB powered and pocket size.
Take your
Rails uses a share-nothing architecture, just like LAMP, and can scale
to kingdom come. At Omniture we used PHP and MySQL to scale far
larger than most of the so-called enterprise applications out there.
Have you ever had to deal with millions of INSERTs per minute? I
have, and I'm here to tell
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 07:30 -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
vim+cscope. It's got a small learning curve that is easily alleviated
with a cheat sheet and has the benefit of not requiring mousing.
Can cscope work with any language besides C and C++? My understanding
is that refactoring in eclipse is
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
And I don't care what you say, Java IS a memory hog. I don't
need some web article to debunk what I can see day in and day out on top
and ps.
...
extra 11, and you still have 45m which ties for top RAM user with
thunderbird, and they're both 20MB more
But what if I need to make a urgent fix from my SSH enabled phone/PDA?
Then you are not developing enterprise level production systems that
need to go through a proper QA cycle with load testing and integration
testing.
Careful with that brush!
True. And I do understand (and yearn for)
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Michael L Torrie wrote:
To really appreciate the benefits of vim/emacs you have to see someone
really proficient in doing the taks with that editor at work. It works
both ways. Are IDEs easier to plod through than vim? yes.
Dr. Scott Woodfield in the BYU CS dept is one
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 at 09:15 -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
And I don't care what you say, Java IS a memory hog. I don't
need some web article to debunk what I can see day in and day out on top
and ps.
...
extra 11, and you still have 45m which ties for top
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 at 09:21 -0700, Ross Werner wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Michael L Torrie wrote:
To really appreciate the benefits of vim/emacs you have to see someone
really proficient in doing the taks with that editor at work. It works
both ways. Are IDEs easier to plod through than vim?
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Hans Fugal wrote:
I'd have to agree that Java is typically more memory-hungry than other
applications--however, in my experience that's only a one-time cost. In
Half a Gig!!! Even emacs can't approach that.
Yeah, but Open Office can, and it's more similar in terms of the
Yes, there is Rapidwave!
Check us out at www.rapidwave.net.
I like to think we have the fastest internet for the best price and lots of
happy customers.
-Sterling
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wade Preston
Shearer
Sent: Thursday,
I've lived in Lehi for two years and have been using airwired. I've
been quite happy with the uptime, and price. You also have a static
Internet IP for external access. I have no info on any other ISPs
there.
Interesting (in regards to price). From the shopping around that I
have done this
On 6/29/06, Wade Preston Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone actually get 6MB with Comcast? I thought that all of
those sales pitches were hooey and that real life speeds were more
like 1 - 1.5 MB.
I've had comcast at two locations in Orem. From my experience I've got
8 megabit
I've had comcast at two locations in Orem. From my experience I've got
8 megabit reliably day or night. Lately, they *require* you to install
some M$ Windows software to verify your computer is ready to surf the
Internet before the line is activated (the route changes at that
time). Never
I've lived in Lehi for two years and have been using airwired. I've
been quite happy with the uptime, and price. You also have a static
Internet IP for external access. I have no info on any other ISPs
there.
Interesting (in regards to price). From the shopping around that I
have done this
I recommend rapidwave.net. Local to (and for) Lehi, and much higher
bandwidth speeds than Utah Broadband/Air Wired. I signed up a month
ago and haven't looked back.
They claim 4 Mb. Do you really get that?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org,
On Jun 29, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Wade Preston Shearer wrote:
I recommend rapidwave.net. Local to (and for) Lehi, and much higher
bandwidth speeds than Utah Broadband/Air Wired. I signed up a month
ago and haven't looked back.
They claim 4 Mb. Do you really get that?
Wade,
You seem to be
They claim 4 Mb. Do you really get that?
Like with Utah Broadband, the connection is burstable to 4Mbs.
However, I have observed 4Mbs more often than not. I love it and
recommend it. If you do sign up, please put me down for a referral.
--
Aaron
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on
And that's why you should use Rapidwave - our 200 pixel top banner ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Simpkins
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 2:47 PM
To: Provo Linux Users Group Mailing List
Subject: Re: non-phone-line internet
Guys
Rails uses a share-nothing architecture, just like LAMP
I wrote a rails app and looking back, I think a big piece of the
performance thing is in wise use of :include in object fetches (if you
do not use :include, then rails will never do joins and will always make
separate queries in each
24 matches
Mail list logo
