I've been using Dovecot for a couple years, and I love it. Never had a
problem, SSL was a breeze. Debian did most of the work for me.
--Dave
Stephen Smith wrote:
We are planning to replace our current mail server which is sendmail
configured for SMTP only. We would like to move to an IMAP ser
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:17 AM, Stephen Smith wrote:
We are planning to replace our current mail server which is
sendmail configured for SMTP only. We would like to move to an
IMAP server with more security. The RH distribution has dovecot as
a secure IMAP server, but I have heard little a
On 7/31/06, Stephen Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What would be your recommendations for quickly moving our existing
server and accounts to a new platform.
I recently switched to a "virutal mailbox" setup using
Postfix + Amavis+ ClamAV + Courier
There are tons of howtos available for this
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:58 -0600, Chris Carey wrote:
>
> I recently switched to a "virutal mailbox" setup using
>
> Postfix + Amavis+ ClamAV + Courier
>
> There are tons of howtos available for this configuration. Finally, no
> more unix accounts required for each mailbox.
While we are at it..
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:17 -0600, Stephen Smith wrote:
> We are planning to replace our current mail server which is sendmail
> configured for SMTP only. We would like to move to an IMAP server with
> more security. The RH distribution has dovecot as a secure IMAP server,
> but I have heard l
--- Stephen Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are planning to replace our current mail server which is
> sendmail configured for SMTP only. We would like to move to
> an IMAP server with more security. The RH distribution has
> dovecot as a secure IMAP server, but I have heard little about
>
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:17 -0600, Stephen Smith wrote:
> We are planning to replace our current mail server which is sendmail
> configured for SMTP only. We would like to move to an IMAP server with
> more security. The RH distribution has dovecot as a secure IMAP server,
> but I have heard l
On 7/30/06, Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
By default, Apache limits each connected user to 2 simultaneous file
downloads. Does anyone know how to change this number? Is there a way to
do it without installing a module?
I've googled and found this, but I'm sure there's a work-around:
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:17 -0600, Stephen Smith wrote:
> What would be your recommendations for quickly moving our existing
> server and accounts to a new platform.
You didn't ask about SMTP servers, but I'd recommend Postfix. It's easy,
it has a good security track record. Michael Torrie point
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:14 -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
> test
550 LOSER ADMIN - Message rejected.
Your message has been rejected because your system administrator has
been reported as a "stinky pants loser". If you feel you this report is
incorrect, please report the error to: hans
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:45 -0600, Stuart Jansen wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:17 -0600, Stephen Smith wrote:
> > What would be your recommendations for quickly moving our existing
> > server and accounts to a new platform.
>
> You didn't ask about SMTP servers, but I'd recommend Postfix. It
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 17:17 -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 16:45 -0600, Stuart Jansen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:17 -0600, Stephen Smith wrote:
> > > What would be your recommendations for quickly moving our existing
> > > server and accounts to a new platform.
>
On Aug 1, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Stuart Jansen wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:14 -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
test
550 LOSER ADMIN - Message rejected.
Your message has been rejected because your system administrator has
been reported as a "stinky pants loser". If you feel you this
report is
incor
By default, Apache limits each connected user to 2 simultaneous file
downloads. Does anyone know how to change this number? Is there a way to
do it without installing a module?
I've googled and found this, but I'm sure there's a work-around:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=1105
If you just want to free up storage space, come up with a reasonable
market value for it, and donate it to an university or high school. You
get a tax deduction that often exceeds what you might get from it
otherwise. Universities can use old equipment to manufacture test
equipment for researc
We are planning to replace our current mail server which is sendmail
configured for SMTP only. We would like to move to an IMAP server with
more security. The RH distribution has dovecot as a secure IMAP server,
but I have heard little about it.
What would be your recommendations for quickly
My employer (Beat The Bookstore) is looking for an all around techno-
genius web/desktop programmer.
About Us:
We are a franchisor of college textbook stores - if you are from Utah
you may be familiar with our stores at the U, UVSC, Weber State, and/
or Utah State. We currently have 20 franc
I've heard the rumor too, but I can't remember where. All I know is I'm
not switching to $() until vim stops highlighting them red.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 at 12:54 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:16:26AM -0600, Gabriel Gunderson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 09:58 -0600,
Iodynamics, an IT and Web services company serving business customers from
Provo to Logan, seeks contract consultants to help meet the increasing
needs of our clients. The expertise and focus of Iodynamics is on
open-source solutions.
We are currently looking for individuals who have good to exce
Thus said "Byron Clark" on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:41:28 MDT:
> I think you meant to use () instead of {}, otherwise your second
> example (and the rest of the message) doesn't make sense.
Maybe he thought that () were actually {} due to the font in his email
client. In this case I recommend
test
--
Hans Fugal ; http://hans.fugal.net
There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the
right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself.
-- Johann Sebastian Bach
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/opti
Hands down, Axigen has been by far and away the easiest to use and
configure mail server, it also does IMAP, POP3 and Webmail.
On 7/31/06, Stephen Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are planning to replace our current mail server which is sendmail
configured for SMTP only. We would like to mov
22 matches
Mail list logo