I heartily agree, although it bears mentioning that some distros are
making the long-overdue migration away from System V init schemes (the
symlinks in /etc/rc.d or similar places) to something better. e.g.
Ubunutu is using upstart, which looks very cool, and Debian has optional
support for
I know this is not what you were asking for but it is none the less a
good cross reference between the different *nix's.
http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
Regards,
John Twitchell
Quoting Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have seen a Linux Quick Reference Guide from O'reilly:
I need to run an automated backup on a Win2k3 server of my Linux server.
I wrote some scripts on the Linux to shut down services, backup to a
dir, compress the dir to a zip/tar file with timestamp, start up
services back up. Now I just need to get them moved onto the backup
server.
The server
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 06:56 -0700, Hans Fugal wrote:
I heartily agree, although it bears mentioning that some distros are
making the long-overdue migration away from System V init schemes (the
symlinks in /etc/rc.d or similar places) to something better. e.g.
Ubunutu is using upstart, which
On 12/8/06, Gabriel Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft says...
NTFS Size Limits -
Architecturally: 16 exabytes minus 1 KB (2^64 bytes minus 1 KB)
Implementation: 16 terabytes minus 64 KB (2^44 bytes minus 64 KB)
4 GB sure sounds small. Where do you get that info?
Gabe
I just
On Dec 8, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 06:56 -0700, Hans Fugal wrote:
I heartily agree, although it bears mentioning that some distros are
making the long-overdue migration away from System V init schemes
(the
symlinks in /etc/rc.d or similar places) to
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 10:40 -0800, Blake Barnett wrote:
launchd doesn't do runlevels, it's mostly designed with the desktop
in mind, and so usually prefers to load things ondemand. But it can
support dependencies, the WatchPaths and QueueDirectories can be used
to enforce the order that
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:39:57PM -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
Except that my Tiger machine is actually Tiger Server, so launchd
leaves a lot to be desired. At least they have cron running, slaved
off of launchd. Tiger desktop does not have this and it is annoying
to no end to have to hack
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Andrew McNabb wrote:
Weird. I have cron running on my Tiger desktop system without having
done any special configuration. I just ran crontab and stuff worked.
Ditto here.
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:00 -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote:
Weird. I have cron running on my Tiger desktop system without having
done any special configuration. I just ran crontab and stuff worked.
Guess I didn't look very hard on the tiger laptops I work on. Launchd
did work ideally for a
I've been looking at these URLs:
http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8728350077.html
http://www.access-company.com/products/linux/alp.html
Interestingly, PalmSource has had some agreement or merger, which makes
me wonder if PalmOS is going Linux...
Anyway, these URLs beg the question: Who
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:22 -0700, Brandon Stout wrote:
I've been looking at these URLs:
http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8728350077.html
http://www.access-company.com/products/linux/alp.html
Interestingly, PalmSource has had some agreement or merger, which makes
me wonder if PalmOS
Bryan Sant wrote:
I just like throwing out non-factual information to keep people
guessing. As it turns out, the partition I copied a large tarball to
was in fact FAT32. I was sure it was NTFS v5, but now I'm not so sure
because I have a dialog in front of me saying that it's FAT (but can I
Runlevels are a nice idea that I've not found much use for personally
(except for single user mode, if you count that). In any case, there's
nothing about runlevels that requires sysv init, it could just as easily
be part of $newfangled_init, although it often isn't (as a design
decision).
Joe Crown wrote:
Yes that's one article stating the FAT32 is limited to 4 GB file size.
I think that is really funny though as FAT16 allowed up to 2 GB for
the file size. So that really wasn't much of an upgrade in that regard.
Fat16 has a 2g limit for an entire drive partition. In pre-fat32
15 matches
Mail list logo
