On AD 2008 January 19 Saturday 02:42:23 PM -0700, Justin Findlay wrote:
> Um, that's not a religious decision. It's about freedom. I guess you
> wouldn't understand since you're OK with whatever Apple puts out.
In that case I guess religion goes both ways. Similarly to what Michael
points out t
justin wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 3:10 PM, Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>>> On 1/19/08, Alex Esplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your second argument kind of trumps your first one. Thanks to the
efforts of fink and/or macports, almost every packaged av
On Jan 19, 2008 3:10 PM, Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> > On 1/19/08, Alex Esplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Your second argument kind of trumps your first one. Thanks to the
> >> efforts of fink and/or macports, almost every packaged available for
> >>
Justin Findlay wrote:
> On AD 2008 January 19 Saturday 01:03:40 PM -0700, Alex Esplin wrote:
>> Your second argument kind of trumps your first one. Thanks to the
>> efforts of fink and/or macports, almost every packaged available for
>> linux is available for OSX. A couple that weren't available
I'm considering getting rid of some older stuff I have laying about
and stumbled upon
http://www.secondrotation.com/
Has anyone used them before?
Sincerely,
Steve
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On 1/19/08, Alex Esplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Your second argument kind of trumps your first one. Thanks to the
>> efforts of fink and/or macports, almost every packaged available for
>> linux is available for OSX.
>
> Have you actually used both fink and, say, apt
On 1/19/08, Alex Esplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your second argument kind of trumps your first one. Thanks to the
> efforts of fink and/or macports, almost every packaged available for
> linux is available for OSX.
Have you actually used both fink and, say, aptitude recently?
Fink sucks. I
On AD 2008 January 19 Saturday 01:03:40 PM -0700, Alex Esplin wrote:
> Your second argument kind of trumps your first one. Thanks to the
> efforts of fink and/or macports, almost every packaged available for
> linux is available for OSX. A couple that weren't available as
> binaries work very wel
On Jan 18, 2008 11:40 PM, Justin Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is interesting you say this. My experience is exactly opposite.
> Linux does all I want and more (in the way I want it to) whereas Macs
> aren't as fun/easy to use. The concept of a distro with updates and a
> universe of pa
