Re: [OT] Change for Obama

2008-09-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Daniel C." on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:27:49 EDT: > Since I can't imagine the city council telling him that he can't have > a garden, I'm going to assume that by "garden" he meant something > obnoxiously huge and/or rank that got so bad it started affecting > neighboring property

Re: [OT] Change for Obama

2008-09-27 Thread Daniel C.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If this is the case, what an excellent example of socialism to be > sure... As if anyone can claim some kind of right to the ``value'' of > their home. By this measure, we should start a Class Action lawsuit

Re: [OT] Change for Obama

2008-09-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Michael Torrie on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:23:01 MDT: > If we want change we probably should sack congress and start over. What's the opposite of progress? Congress! I know, pretty bad humor, but I couldn't resist. Andy -- [---[system uptime]---

Re: [OT] Change for Obama

2008-09-27 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 14:22 -0400, Daniel C. wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Andy Bradford > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If this is the case, what an excellent example of socialism to be > > sure... As if anyone can claim some kind of right to the ``value'' of > > their home.

Re: [OT] Change for Obama

2008-09-27 Thread Trevor Sharpe
Stuart Jansen wrote: > Andy is completely serious. He would enjoy a strip joint next door, a > bar across the street, and a hog farm upwind. Is it a package deal? Because if it comes without the hogfarm. I will give it a +1. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http:/