Re: List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Shane Hathaway
Andrew McNabb wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 08:03:08AM -0600, Stuart Jansen wrote: This is why I hate April 1st. I'm pretty sure that Ryan has been around for the debate before and knows what a bad idea this is. He's just yanking out chain. Wow. I totally fell for it. That's awesome. :) T

Re: F/OS OCR?

2009-04-01 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 10:15:06AM -0600, Daniel C. wrote: > Thanks to everyone, I'll check those out. Let us know what you come up with, would you? -- Charles Curley /"\ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ /Respect for open standards and/or writing?

Re: List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Ryan Simpkins
On Wed, April 1, 2009 06:52, Ryan Simpkins wrote: > It has come to my attention that the overwhelming majority would prefer > to have the Reply-To header on this list remain untouched. I will be changing > the list tomorrow morning first thing to not munge reply-to. Please update > your procmail fi

Re: F/OS OCR?

2009-04-01 Thread Daniel C.
Thanks to everyone, I'll check those out. -Dan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */

Re: List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Louis Zirkel
Stuart Jansen wrote: This is why I hate April 1st. I'm pretty sure that Ryan has been around for the debate before and knows what a bad idea this is. He's just yanking out chain. Pot calling the kettle black... ;) I appreciate the way you masterfully started the flame war about netiquette o

Re: F/OS OCR?

2009-04-01 Thread Doran L. Barton
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 22:31:54 Scott Edwards wrote: > I haven't used OCR on Linux in a while, but here are to candidates I found > that are available in Debian Etch. (yes, I haven't upgraded, *yet*). > > gocr is a multi-platform OCR (Optical Character Recognition) program. > > Clara OCR is inten

Re: List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 08:03:08AM -0600, Stuart Jansen wrote: > > This is why I hate April 1st. I'm pretty sure that Ryan has been around > for the debate before and knows what a bad idea this is. He's just > yanking out chain. Wow. I totally fell for it. That's awesome. :) -- Andrew McNabb

RE: F/OS OCR?

2009-04-01 Thread Jones, Scott (GE Money, consultant)
...Or this >> http://www.linux.com/articles/57222 -Original Message- From: plug-boun...@plug.org [mailto:plug-boun...@plug.org] On Behalf Of Daniel C. Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:08 PM To: plug@plug.org Subject: F/OS OCR? Does anyone have any experience using f/os OCR packages? I

RE: F/OS OCR?

2009-04-01 Thread Jones, Scott (GE Money, consultant)
Have you tried this > http://sourceforge.net/projects/tesseract-ocr/ I have used it to scan various documents and it works well. Scott -Original Message- From: plug-boun...@plug.org [mailto:plug-boun...@plug.org] On Behalf Of Daniel C. Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:08 PM To: plug@pl

Re: List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Stuart Jansen
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 06:52 -0600, Ryan Simpkins wrote: > It has come to my attention that the overwhelming majority would prefer > to have the Reply-To header on this list remain untouched. I will be changing > the list tomorrow morning first thing to not munge reply-to. Please update > your procm

Re: List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 06:52:00AM -0600, Ryan Simpkins wrote: > It has come to my attention that the overwhelming majority would prefer > to have the Reply-To header on this list remain untouched. I will be changing > the list tomorrow morning first thing to not munge reply-to. Please update > you

List reply-to

2009-04-01 Thread Ryan Simpkins
It has come to my attention that the overwhelming majority would prefer to have the Reply-To header on this list remain untouched. I will be changing the list tomorrow morning first thing to not munge reply-to. Please update your procmail filters, client filters, and reply button habits! /* PLUG: