Dave Smith wrote:
Yes, this question came up about a year ago, and XMPP and IRC were
considered. I never really pursued those options further because I'm
somewhat opposed to having a central broker (for lack of a better
word) that acts as a single point of failure, and adds complexity
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Shane Hathawaysh...@hathawaymix.org wrote:
In the last distributed system I helped build, we didn't feel good about
having a central point of control (and failure), but in the end we
decided that a fully distributed system would add unjustifiable
complexity
Does anyone know what this is:
http://www.thehive.com/
Aside from the fact that they seem to know the answer to the Ultimate
Question of life, the universe, and everything, I can't tell what they
actually do.
--Dave
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe:
http://codeclimber.blogspot.com/2008/04/hive.html
http://www.aboutus.org/TheHive.com
It sounds like they are fizzlin'.
Richard
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 01:36:46 Dave Smith d...@thesmithfam.org wrote:
Does anyone know what this is:
http://www.thehive.com/
Aside from the fact that
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Richard Esplin
richard-li...@esplins.orgwrote:
http://codeclimber.blogspot.com/2008/04/hive.html
http://www.aboutus.org/TheHive.com
It sounds like they are fizzlin'.
Richard
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 01:36:46 Dave Smith d...@thesmithfam.org
wrote:
The Hive is a group of companies under The Hive umbrella. Mostly LAMP
Engineers. Their main source of revenue is singles.net a dating
service. You see it all the time on Yahoo web page. They are virtual
company and each developer works from their house. Pretty cool company
but they are VERY
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:50:21 -0600
Joel Finlinson j...@finlinson.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Richard Esplin
richard-li...@esplins.orgwrote:
That's who Charles Curley works for, isn't it? ;-) Sounds like
they're similar to End Point
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 18:54 -0600, Wade Preston Shearer wrote:
I ran the script, loading the new settings and restarting iptables. It
appears to have worked correct as all services are running as
expected. Logging onto the server via SSH is slower now. Is that to be
expected with the
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Wade Preston
Shearerwadeshearer.li...@me.com wrote:
On 25 Aug 2009, at 21:54, Michael Torrie wrote:
Well once logged in, run the w or who commands and see what IP
address you're coming from, then see what host ##.##.##.## says.
Thanks for the help. w and who
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:41 -0600, Lonnie Olson wrote:
No, this is caused because you are blocking the return DNS replies.
In your last copy of the script, you left out the return traffic.
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
You seemed to replace it with
On Wednesday, August 26, 2009, at 09:41AM, Lonnie Olson li...@kittypee.com
wrote:
No, this is caused because you are blocking the return DNS replies.
In your last copy of the script, you left out the return traffic.
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
You
11 matches
Mail list logo
