On Wed, April 27, 2011 11:31, Jacob Albretsen wrote:
> I am learning puppet and setting up modules for some servers. Although I know
> this works from my testing, my spidey sense is tingling, and I want to know if
> what I am doing is "right."
Please note following doc:
http://projects.puppetlabs
Not sure how secure it is, but the best (as in most interesting)
password system I've ever seen is not really a password at all.
Instead a series of pictures say 10 or 20 is shown to the user, for
instance square, circle, triangle, etc.
The user then selects as many pictures as they want to build
I like brainshell.
Makethebadmanstop is too adverserial imho
Eric Wald wrote:
>Alan Young wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 22:34, Steven Morrey wrote:
>>> Does anyone have a spare domain name laying around that they would
>>> care to donate to the cause? Preferably with a .org TLD?
>>>
>>> I'
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 11:08 -0600, Eric Wald wrote:
> I see no reason for password length restriction to be less than 127
> characters. However, allowing a full megabyte would probably be
> excessive. Is there a best-practices limit? 1K, perhaps?
Best practice has generally been salted hashes,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Eric Wald wrote:
> Daniel C. wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Eric Wald wrote:
>>> No, "racking" is correct in this case. I'd have thought the opposite
>>> before researching the issue, though:
>>>
>>> http://www.grammarist.com/usage-errors/homophone-c
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Eric Wald wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, Aaron Toponce wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:49:36AM -0600, Eric Wald wrote:
>>> Over 25,000 reasonable straight-line passwords; double that to include
>>> spirals. Certainly with range for a dictionary attack, but it woul
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Eric Wald wrote:
> Lest I misrepresent myself, I am not affiliated with the Grammarist.
> My "research" was limited to several minutes on a search engine; the
> linked article was simply the clearest summary of information that was
> also available in dictionaries
Daniel C. wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Eric Wald wrote:
>> No, "racking" is correct in this case. I'd have thought the opposite
>> before researching the issue, though:
>>
>> http://www.grammarist.com/usage-errors/homophone-confusion/rack-vs-wrack/
>>
>> Turns out that I would have s
On Sat, Apr 23, Levi Pearson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
>
>> And despite all the effort gone into the theory and things coming out
>> of it, it is still just a theory, and with demonstrable flaws at
>> that--yet most physicists refuse to even question it--they
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Eric Wald wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, Daniel C. wrote:
>> No time whatsoever spent in front of a blackboard,
>> racking (or do I want "wracking"?) his brain (which was certainly not
>> filled with hard-earned knowledge) for a solution.
>
> No, "racking" is correct in
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Walker wrote:
> On Thu, April 28, 2011 11:24 am, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
>> One of my accounts a while back changed their password method--they
>> emailed me saying that to "increase security" they had stripped all
>> non-alphanumerics out of my password! T
On Fri, Apr 22, Daniel C. wrote:
> No time whatsoever spent in front of a blackboard,
> racking (or do I want "wracking"?) his brain (which was certainly not
> filled with hard-earned knowledge) for a solution.
No, "racking" is correct in this case. I'd have thought the opposite
before researchin
On Thu, April 28, 2011 11:24 am, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> One of my accounts a while back changed their password method--they
> emailed me saying that to "increase security" they had stripped all
> non-alphanumerics out of my password! That is disturbing on many
> levels.
Ouch. The most disturbing
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Eric Wald wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
>> Passwords are not infinite in length. I have never once found a system
>> that allows me to choose a password of arbitrary length. Every one I
>> have encountered has a hard upper limit on the length, us
Alan Young wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 22:34, Steven Morrey wrote:
>> Does anyone have a spare domain name laying around that they would
>> care to donate to the cause? Preferably with a .org TLD?
>>
>> I'm sure we have enough grey matter here to figure out a way to build
>> an identity arou
On Tue, Apr 26, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> Passwords are not infinite in length. I have never once found a system
> that allows me to choose a password of arbitrary length. Every one I
> have encountered has a hard upper limit on the length, usually 16-20,
> some (including some banks--shudder!) as s
On Tue, Apr 26, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:49:36AM -0600, Eric Wald wrote:
>> Over 25,000 reasonable straight-line passwords; double that to include
>> spirals. Certainly with range for a dictionary attack, but it would
>> take long enough that I could re-print the card, pri
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Alan Young wrote:
> [snip some good discussion and description of basically my beliefs on
> this topic by other people ending with]
> "I would hope this would make each LEO think really hard before
> choosing to cross the line."
>
> There is a fatal flaw with this
[snip some good discussion and description of basically my beliefs on
this topic by other people ending with]
"I would hope this would make each LEO think really hard before
choosing to cross the line."
There is a fatal flaw with this idea(l). This presupposes a
relatively high level of rationali
>
> I have makethebadmanstop.org ...
>
rofl, I love it!
-Eric
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
On 28 Apr 2011, at 08:05, Alan Young wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 22:34, Steven Morrey wrote:
>> Does anyone have a spare domain name laying around that they would
>> care to donate to the cause? Preferably with a .org TLD?
>>
>> I'm sure we have enough grey matter here to figure out a way
> well let that one go. But, if they determine that some ordinary Joe
> wound up being harassed and was innocent, they will probably let the
> LEO take some punishment. I would hope this would make each LEO think
> really hard before choosing to cross the line.
>
>
Sounds like a worthy option so fa
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Charles Curley
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:41:11 -0600
> Steven Morrey wrote:
>
>> I think adding personal liability at the executive level, makes it a
>> bit more threatening.
>> Decision makers tend to tread lightly, where the veil is thin.
>
> It would ten
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 22:34, Steven Morrey wrote:
> Does anyone have a spare domain name laying around that they would
> care to donate to the cause? Preferably with a .org TLD?
>
> I'm sure we have enough grey matter here to figure out a way to build
> an identity around it.
I have makethebad
24 matches
Mail list logo
