*Thank you for the well wishes! You're correct it's a very hard situation.
But all any of us can do is make the best of the situation we find
ourselves in. Mine sucks, but I keep reminding myself it could be a lot
worse.*
* *
*--- Dan*
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Daniel Fussell wrote:
>
*Appreciated, Sasha! And yes I'll be the first to admit the good reason for
being in a bad place.*
* *
*--- Dan*
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> > A Google search for "Daniel David Egli" should probably give you an idea
> as
> > to why the security is so tight where he
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Stuart Jansen wrote:
> International man of mystery. Think James Bond with root.
So, Enoch.
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 09:09 -0600, Ryan Moore wrote:
> >
> > A Google search for "Daniel David Egli" should probably give you an idea as
> > to why the security is so tight where he is at. As long as you don't ever
> > have to deal with your security being that tight, you'll probably be ok.
> >
> >
On 03/13/2013 03:25 PM, Sasha Pachev wrote:
>> A Google search for "Daniel David Egli" should probably give you an idea as
>> to why the security is so tight where he is at. As long as you don't ever
>> have to deal with your security being that tight, you'll probably be ok.
> Dan is not in a good
> A Google search for "Daniel David Egli" should probably give you an idea as
> to why the security is so tight where he is at. As long as you don't ever
> have to deal with your security being that tight, you'll probably be ok.
Dan is not in a good place for a good reason, and I suppose he will b
>
> A Google search for "Daniel David Egli" should probably give you an idea as
> to why the security is so tight where he is at. As long as you don't ever
> have to deal with your security being that tight, you'll probably be ok.
>
>
Ok, I'll bite: Prison?
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.f
*Unless you get stuck working out here in the Bayous of Louisanna for this
branch of the federal government then you don't have to worry about it. I
don't even know what the program is called, They simply call it "mail" on
this computer. I still think though that the stars are not being inserted
by
*Unless you get stuck working out here in the Bayous of Louisanna for this
branch of the federal government then you don't have to worry about it. I
don't even know what the program is called, They simply call it "mail" on
this computer. I still think though that the stars are not being inserted
by
On 3/11/13 8:11 AM, Doran L. Barton wrote:
> What program is this that inserts spurious asterisks for no apparent reason
> whatsoever, doesn't include any User-Agent headers, and doesn't follow
> convention by populating an In-Reply-To header for replies or prepend "Re:" in
> the subject line?!
>
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Doran L. Barton wrote:
> What program is this that inserts spurious asterisks for no apparent reason
> whatsoever, doesn't include any User-Agent headers, and doesn't follow
> convention by populating an In-Reply-To header for replies or prepend
> "Re:" in
> the s
What program is this that inserts spurious asterisks for no apparent reason
whatsoever, doesn't include any User-Agent headers, and doesn't follow
convention by populating an In-Reply-To header for replies or prepend "Re:" in
the subject line?!
Sheeesh.
At least it does do (poorly formatted)
12 matches
Mail list logo
