I kinda like the license terms:
http://zapatopi.net/mindguard/mgpl.html
(-: Chas.M. :-)
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:53:01 +
> From: crawford.rainwa...@linux-etc.com
> To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> Subject: Re: PLUG-discuss Digest, Vol 90, Issue 21
>
> Eric and company:
>
> Iro
Unless I totally missed something. Worst apocalypse ever...
On Dec 21, 2012 9:10 PM, "Brian Cluff" wrote:
> Patience... there's still a few hours left...
>
> Brian Cluff
>
> On 12/21/2012 08:24 PM, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> welp... it is now 8:30 I think the destruction of the world isn't
>>
MAN! Can't I cut a break?
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Stephen wrote:
> Unless I totally t I cmissed something. Worst apocalypse ever...
> On Dec 21, 2012 9:10 PM, "Brian Cluff" wrote:
>
>> Patience... there's still a few hours left...
>>
>> Brian Cluff
>>
>> On 12/21/2012 08:
:-P
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Michael Havens wrote:
> MAN! Can't I cut a break?
> :-)~MIKE~(-:
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Unless I totally t I cmissed something. Worst apocalypse ever...
>> On Dec 21, 2012 9:10 PM, "Brian Cluff" wrote:
>>
>>> Patience...
Well Y2K didn't get us. Mayan calendar didn't get us.
Doesn't the Unix clock stop at 2038? -- 2028 is only 25 years away
The year 2038 problem may cause some computer software to fail at some point
near the year 2038. The problem affects all software and systems that both
store sys
what... they haven't fixed it yet?
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:21 AM, keith smith wrote:
>
>
> Well Y2K didn't get us. Mayan calendar didn't get us.
>
> Doesn't the Unix clock stop at 2038? -- 2028 is only 25 years away
>
> The year 2038 problem may cause some computer softw
It's a little more complicated than just switching to a bigger number.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
Brian Cluff
On 12/22/2012 10:49 AM, Michael Havens wrote:
what... they haven't fixed it yet?
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:21 AM, keith smith mailto:klsmith2...@yah
Anyone still using vulnerable software will wait until June 2037. Then
there will be a mad rush to fix the software and programmers yet to be
born will make a fortune.
On 12/22/2012 11:40 AM, Brian Cluff wrote:
It's a little more complicated than just switching to a bigger number.
http://en.w
Don't forget that WIndows machines will hit this date crisis in 2016...and
Macs in 29,940.
Mark
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Derek Trotter wrote:
> Anyone still using vulnerable software will wait until June 2037. Then
> there will be a mad rush to fix the software and programmers yet to be
Now that is funny!!
Keith Smith
--- On Sat, 12/22/12, Derek Trotter wrote:
From: Derek Trotter
Subject: Re: The end of the world
To: "Main PLUG discussion list"
Date: Saturday, December 22, 2012, 4:05 PM
Anyone still using vulnerable software will wait until
That's how it turned out with the y2k bug. It was discovered in 1969
and it wasn't until 1999 that it was fixed.
On 12/22/2012 06:21 PM, keith smith wrote:
Now that is funny!!
Keith Smith
--- On *Sat, 12/22/12, Derek Trotter //* wrote:
From: Derek Trotter
I think I was dual-booting at that time. My windows box (XP) wasn't
affected.
:-)~MIKE~(-:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Derek Trotter wrote:
> That's how it turned out with the y2k bug. It was discovered in 1969
> and it wasn't until 1999 that it was fixed.
>
> On 12/22/2012 06:21 PM, kei
12 matches
Mail list logo
