Yeah I would send it back :-p
On Nov 25, 2016 4:37 PM, "Michael" wrote:
> I would love to use a *nix native file system but I want to be able to
> share this between systems. Everytime the thing goes to a new line the
> write error is incremented by 1. This is a new disk. It shouldn't do that!
>
I would love to use a *nix native file system but I want to be able to
share this between systems. Everytime the thing goes to a new line the
write error is incremented by 1. This is a new disk. It shouldn't do that!
I think I should send it back! What do you guys think?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:
I have not tried with arch but there both grub2 and efigrub efi and uefi
needs its own fat partition to keep os keys in and secure boot usually must
be off but I have had several that would only work with secure boot on. as
best I can tell bios are implemented is different ways by each company that
Currently i Run Only 2 2 2k and 1 1080p no disconnects, no blips nothing. i
even sent audio over hdmi with success.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
> How many displays do you run Stephen? Do they ever disconnect, or go away
> like a laptop being detached between home and
How many displays do you run Stephen? Do they ever disconnect, or
go away like a laptop being detached between home and work?
Do you use kde display to manage them, nvidia-settings, some
combination of both? Do you have it write an xorg.conf?
Quick test if you
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/65349/how-to-interpret-badblocks-output
Sounds like it had a lot of writing errors. Thing is I'll not sure how to
deal with it while using NTFS
http://linux.bigresource.com/General-NTFS-marking-sectors-bad--aLwrEyk32.html
If you use ext3 or ext4 you can c
So taking to heart that perhaps I have simply outgrown ubuntu and its
ilk, I decide to explore arch again. So far, it's been painful.
In "the good old days" of everything being 512byte sectors, circular
geometry, and new-fangled ssd with this ^2 thing, I adapted my installs
to align things wi
I have had no issues running Kbuntu and the 1070 with the binary drivers
from repo.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
> So far I am NOT impressed with my choice to go with nvidia, as the
> graphics change from amd has caused everything to become entirely unstable
> again.
>
So far I am NOT impressed with my choice to go with nvidia, as the
graphics change from amd has caused everything to become entirely
unstable again.
KDE neon is a basketcase, again with these nvidia binary drivers.
Installing what I thought would have been generally resolved from 5.7.4
on my
I was wondering:
The print out on the terminal reads:
1973729 done, 3:49:08 elapsed. (0/7649/0 errors)
what does "(0/7649/0 errors)" mean?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Michael wrote:
> I'm trying to run 'badblocks' but each time I run it get the same thing.
>
> $ sudo badblocks -b 4096 -
> From: Bob Holtzman
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:06:29 -0700
>
> Take your HTML and.
>
> My apologies to anyone I've offended with that.
It's the ones you've frightened that you should worry about. ;-)
I didn't even see the HTML. What damaged email reader are you
abusing? :-) :-)
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:14:12PM -0700, Michael Butash wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> I'd say you have a bad unit. Try pulling the drive out of it and
> connecting it direct to a sata bus and see if that works to get a
> response to the bus. Either the drive, or the usb conve
I should have realized that! Thanks
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Brien Dieterle wrote:
> Gparted tells you. It was /dev/sdd before, but check again as it can
> change. Also unmount the filesystem first
>
> On Nov 25, 2016 8:50 AM, "Michael" wrote:
>
> I'm trying to run 'badblocks' bu
Gparted tells you. It was /dev/sdd before, but check again as it can
change. Also unmount the filesystem first
On Nov 25, 2016 8:50 AM, "Michael" wrote:
I'm trying to run 'badblocks' but each time I run it get the same thing.
$ sudo badblocks -b 4096 -c 98304 -p 0 -w -s /media/bmike1/NexStar
I'm trying to run 'badblocks' but each time I run it get the same thing.
$ sudo badblocks -b 4096 -c 98304 -p 0 -w -s /media/bmike1/NexStar
badblocks: invalid starting block (0): must be less than 0
.
.
.
I just googled the error and find:
-Apparently this is Linux-speak for "This program needs
I don't know... it is so weird! I stepped away from the computer for the
night. I thought all activity between gparted and the drive had ceased. In
the morning everything was good. It was even reformatted just a few minutes
ago. I think I'll run badblock on the device.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:1
16 matches
Mail list logo
