Re: Cox Gigablast

um. they block it on residential. I am on business and all ports are open (or can be made that way from the admin page on my cox business account). I also enjoy a real honest fixed ip here. can't say that for residential. -eric from the central offices of the Technomage Guild, the Mine's

Re: Cox Gigablast

Google Domains will do a pure redirect of all 80 to any URL. even https over http. Https is not blocked. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:54 PM, kelly stephenson wrote: > Cox blocks incoming port 80 requests, what is your plan to get around this > for your web site you plan

Re: Cox Gigablast

Cox blocks incoming port 80 requests, what is your plan to get around this for your web site you plan on hosting? On Nov 19, 2017 7:01 PM, "Eric Oyen" wrote: > oh joy! they would make you have to adapt to a new technology. > > -eric > from the central offices of the

Re: Cox Gigablast

oh joy! they would make you have to adapt to a new technology. -eric from the central offices of the Technomage Guild, You can't get there from here Dept. On Nov 19, 2017, at 6:59 PM, Stephen Partington wrote: > I am looking at a node.js nginx build because my current hosting company > won't

Re: Cox Gigablast

I am looking at a node.js nginx build because my current hosting company won't support node.js without a Vps and I cannot wrap my head around the Google cloud app engine yet for posting node.js yet. On Nov 19, 2017 6:50 PM, "Eric Oyen" wrote: > yep. :) > I am going to have

Re: Cox Gigablast

yep. :) I am going to have to setup a DMZ on my personal router pointed to a specific machine. there I will have to setup the web server, a site (which I will need to register) and a few other goodies. nice thing about my router, I can assign separate subnet segments to each port. this way, if

Re: Cox Gigablast

well, it took a little thinking to come up with the figure they quote for monthly usage. Consider that a typical 1080p Hi-def video stream is about 750 Kb/sec. if left going 24/7 for 30 days, that would be 2.7 GB per hour or about 64 Gb per day. over the course of a month, that is: 1.944 Tb.

Re: Re: Cox Gigablast

Wow. Looks like they did change it right after I got it. https://www.cox.com/aboutus/policies/speeds-and-data-plans.html?zip=85228 On Nov 19, 2017 12:48 PM, "Jerry Snitselaar" wrote: > On Sun Nov 19 17, Stephen Partington wrote: > >> Last I read gigablast was 2t not 1. >>

Re: Re: Cox Gigablast

Wow. Looks like they did change it right after I got it. https://www.cox.com/aboutus/policies/speeds-and-data-plans.html?zip=85228 On Nov 19, 2017 12:48 PM, "Jerry Snitselaar" wrote: > On Sun Nov 19 17, Stephen Partington wrote: > >> Last I read gigablast was 2t not 1. >>

Re: Looking for video editing software

It should work in gnome. On Nov 18, 2017 9:29 PM, "Mark Phillips" wrote: > The newer version of Openshot is OK. It sill crashes on almost every move > of a clip in a track, but at least it does not exit! Very painful editing, > but it is now creating my video, so I

Re: Looking for video editing software

On 2017-11-18 21:29, Mark Phillips wrote: I run gnome, so I assume kdenlive is not supported? You can run KDE applications even if your desktop environment is GNOME, or if you're running xfce (or twm). The first KDE application you start may create some support processes that only KDE

Re: Re: Cox Gigablast

On Sun Nov 19 17, Stephen Partington wrote: Last I read gigablast was 2t not 1. What it shows on the page for services and offers is 1024gb. Could be a typo, but the offer details page also said all plans offer 1024gb data. Will find out when I call. :) Would be nice if it was 2t, that would

Re: Cox Gigablast

heh. you know what's funny? if I had the storage (about 200 TB), I could effectively download about 100 TB for a month on my circuit and not run into overages. that's the nice thing about business class service: no caps. However, if I were to do that, cox would call me up and ask if I am

Re: Looking for video editing software

The 2.4.1 version of Openshot is actually a complete rewrite of using totally different technologies (libopenshot instead of the MeLT framework), so in a lot of ways it's a lot less mature than the "older" version 1.3. You were probably better off with the latest of the first generation of

Re: Re: Cox Gigablast

On Sat Nov 18 17, Stephen Partington wrote: This is what i had before gig. And the service was great. But i use way more than 1t of data in a month. So gig was actually a savings. They have capped new gigablast subscribers with the 1tb limit unfortunately. If you had it prior to late Sept,