Re: Debian Stable vs Ubuntu LTS vs Others for a NAS

I would just go with Debian Stable. You're already comfortable with this. Why not? Then you'd have all the flexibility you need down the road if you decide to do more with the box. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Matthew Crews wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm sure this

Re: Debian Stable vs Ubuntu LTS vs Others for a NAS

FreeNAS sounds like a good plan, but the main problem I have is that my wifi adapter needs a non-free firmware, and I don't know enough about BSD to find/instal compatible drivers. Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email. Original Message

Re: SBG 6700 AC

Top light solid. Second light blinking. 3rd and 4th light out bottom two lights solid On Nov 20, 2017 10:06 PM, "Stephen Partington" wrote: > Define not working > > On Nov 20, 2017 6:58 PM, "Michael" wrote: > >> I bought a Arris SBG 6700 AC and it does

Re: SBG 6700 AC

And are you talking about this guy? http://www.arris.com/surfboard/products/wi-fi-cable-modems/sbg6700-ac/ On Nov 20, 2017 8:06 PM, "Stephen Partington" wrote: > Define not working > > On Nov 20, 2017 6:58 PM, "Michael" wrote: > >> I bought a Arris SBG

Re: SBG 6700 AC

Define not working On Nov 20, 2017 6:58 PM, "Michael" wrote: > I bought a Arris SBG 6700 AC and it does not work any advice on how to get > it to work? > > --- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To

Re: Debian Stable vs Ubuntu LTS vs Others for a NAS

I'll second that. FreeNAS or even NAS4Free is a great out of the box NAS solution. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. < herminio.hernande...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you are looking for a NAS solution, then I would recommend FreeNAS > highly. The web interface is easy to use,

Re: OT: How to print a pdf document larger?

Some print drivers will give an option fit to page with an enlarge. Otherwise you may have to modify the doc. On Nov 20, 2017 4:51 PM, wrote: > Is there a way to print a pdf document that is > formatted to 6" x 9" to an 8.5" x 11" page? > > And how can one do that for a

Re: Debian Stable vs Ubuntu LTS vs Others for a NAS

If you are looking for a NAS solution, then I would recommend FreeNAS highly. The web interface is easy to use, plus you get first class ZFS support. On Nov 20, 2017 2:10 PM, "Matthew Crews" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm sure this comes up every so often. > > I'm in the

OT: How to print a pdf document larger?

Is there a way to print a pdf document that is formatted to 6" x 9" to an 8.5" x 11" page? And how can one do that for a multi-page book? --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your

Debian Stable vs Ubuntu LTS vs Others for a NAS

Hi all, I'm sure this comes up every so often. I'm in the process of repurposing an older desktop machine I have lying around and turning it into a NAS. I would like to do as little system administration as possible once it is set up. I would like relatively recent packages too, but I do NOT

Re: Cox Gigablast

For the record, It requires an ONT that will be provided by cox, also they will provide you a netgear AC1750 router. The one i got accepted DDWRT but performed horribly, but that allowed me to install the non cox netgear firmware that has been getting me the best speeds. I think this is because

Re: Cox Gigablast

I just signed up for gigablast also. I also just order the Motorola 3.1 modem because my current one is 3.0. The bad thing is that it's not like the fiber gigablast. It's 1000Mb down and 35 up. Jason Regards, Jason From: "Snyder, Alexander J"

Re: Cox Gigablast

Me too ... I checked a couple weeks ago and it wasn't available ... but I just checked now and GIGABLAST is finally available in my area! I'm so stoked ... based on the chatter, I'm sure to enjoy it. Oh, what's that? It requires a DOCSIS 3.1 modem? Oh, you just spent nearly $300 on a fancy

Re: Cox Gigablast

Yes definitely, I signed up for gigablast this weekend which was inspired by the chatter. On Nov 20, 2017 10:11 AM, "Stephen Partington" wrote: > To be fair they are reasonable ports to block. And they have relaxed on > 443 and 22/21 since I started. > > On Nov 20, 2017

Re: Cox Gigablast

To be fair they are reasonable ports to block. And they have relaxed on 443 and 22/21 since I started. On Nov 20, 2017 9:34 AM, "kelly stephenson" wrote: > Good solution, my previous provider didn't block anything so it caught me > off guard when I went to open that

Re: Cox Gigablast

Good solution, my previous provider didn't block anything so it caught me off guard when I went to open that port. Cox residential blocks quite a few ports it turns out. On Nov 19, 2017 8:20 PM, "Stephen Partington" wrote: > Google Domains will do a pure redirect of all

Re: Cox Gigablast

So I can take everything that comes in at 80 and 443 and send them to 443, then use letsencrypt for certs. [image: Inline image 1] On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Stephen Partington wrote: > That is very true, Google Domains has a DDNS functionality that you can > use to

Re: Cox Gigablast

That is very true, Google Domains has a DDNS functionality that you can use to update your IP with them. Very smooth. On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Eric Oyen wrote: > um. they block it on residential. I am on business and all ports are open > (or can be made that way