Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
With my domain hosting at google domains they have an option to take all domain.thing and www.domain.thing and direct it all to a single URL, HTTP or HTTPS which I can then use to run a dynamic DNS link at home. in this case, they support a dynamic DNS directly. so that works out really nicely On

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Michael Butash
Ah, that's an interesting conundrum, haven't had to setup a website in a good while since I let lapse my digitalocean instance, wasn't so much an issue there. Guess there's always reverse proxies for that if a necessity. It was just easier to put stuff like that out on a cheap instance somewhere

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
shouldn't "sudo apt-get --fix-broken ufraw ufraw-batch-" still have the install to resemble sudo apt-get --fix-broken install ufraw ufraw-batch- On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Michael wrote: > $ sudo apt-get --fix-broken ufraw ufraw-batch- > E: Command line option --fix-broken is not understo

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
It will use 80 and fallback to 443 the synology clients just does 443 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Todd Cole wrote: > I think lets encrypt only uses port 80 outbound and 443 outbound so one > should be able to use it on any port incoming but to be honest most of my > servers are personal sel

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Todd Cole
I think lets encrypt only uses port 80 outbound and 443 outbound so one should be able to use it on any port incoming but to be honest most of my servers are personal self signed on irregular ports and the few public servers are lets encrypt with a external redirect so that it is easier to maintain

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Michael
$ sudo apt-get --fix-broken ufraw ufraw-batch- E: Command line option --fix-broken is not understood in combination with the other options $ sudo apt-get --fix-broken ufraw ufraw-batch - E: Command line option --fix-broken is not understood in combination with the other options On Fri, Dec 15, 2

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
the only thing I care about for HTTP at all is my Synology letsencypt cert call requires 80, and only 80. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Michael Butash wrote: > Agreed here about just doing https, I've just always used straight > ipsec/openvpn, or later a https sslvpn to connect home to things

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Michael Butash
Agreed here about just doing https, I've just always used straight ipsec/openvpn, or later a https sslvpn to connect home to things when allowed. Never really had a need otherwise to host 80 or smtp, and back then they even blocked 443. At some point later they stopped filtering https (think Part

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Eric Oyen
as far as I know, they don't. I may have to look at my contract to make sure. However, if I do move out of the cox area before my plan is up, I don't have to worry about the ETF. That, I did get in writing. anyway, I am fairly happy with the service I have gotten so far. It beats the hell out o

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
i love mine, in my area its fiber. so i have 1g/1g and average about 850 to 900 On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:37 PM, kelly stephenson wrote: > I've had gigablast for a week or so. Uses existing cable lines. I get > 850 down and 35 up > . Seems to work pretty good. > > On Nov 17, 2017 12:13 PM, "J

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread der.hans
Am 15. Dec, 2017 schwätzte Michael so: Looks like ufraw-batch needs to create its own desktop icon. ufraw-batch depends on ufraw, so there's a conflict until the packages are updated. Is there a new version of ufraw available? sudo apt-get --fix-broken ufraw ufraw-batch- That will say to upgr

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
My solution is to run everything on https with a lets encrypt cert and a port 80 to 443 redirect via my Domain registrar. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:30 PM, der.hans wrote: > Am 19. Nov, 2017 schwätzte kelly stephenson so: > > moin moin, > > Cox blocks incoming port 80 requests, what is your plan

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread kelly stephenson
I've had gigablast for a week or so. Uses existing cable lines. I get 850 down and 35 up . Seems to work pretty good. On Nov 17, 2017 12:13 PM, "Jerry Snitselaar" wrote: > Anyone using this service? It looks like it finally arrived in our > neighborhood. I'd prefer to try Google Fiber, but th

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
wow. I haven't had anything like that happen. But i have not dealt with their business side much. and I tend to be very self-sufficient. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:21 PM, der.hans wrote: > Am 18. Nov, 2017 schwätzte Eric Oyen so: > > moin moin, > > does Cox Business still want a one year cancell

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread der.hans
Am 19. Nov, 2017 schwätzte kelly stephenson so: moin moin, Cox blocks incoming port 80 requests, what is your plan to get around this for your web site you plan on hosting? Cox residential blocks ports. I have gotten around it for years by not using Cox residential :). Most of the time I've

Re: Cox Gigablast

2017-12-15 Thread der.hans
Am 18. Nov, 2017 schwätzte Eric Oyen so: moin moin, does Cox Business still want a one year cancellation notice? Cox Business wanted a new contract to move the service and the new contract stipulated a 12 month notice for cancellation. I moved to Century Link :). Cox also completely borked up

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
I would try removing those files specifically and re-run your updates. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Michael wrote: > $ sudo apt-get --fix-broken install > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Correcting dependencies... Done > The fol

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Michael
$ sudo apt-get --fix-broken install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following additional packages will be installed: ufraw-batch The following packages will be upgraded: ufraw-batch 1 upgraded, 0 newly

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Brian Cluff
Looks like you did just "sudo apt-get  --fix-broken" when you should have done "sudo apt-get  --fix-broken install" The fix command needs a command that gives apt instructions on what to do when it finds something to fix.  Usually you'll want to install missing packages in order to fix missing

Re: Hello Phoenix Linux Users Group! What Goes On at Installfest?

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen M
Best LUG I've ever been a part of. On Dec 15, 2017 2:03 PM, "Todd Cole" wrote: > yes we do installs yes we build stuff both yours and ours and others yes > we do drivers a lot of chat a lot of "who knows how to XX" > a lot of what is the best distro? and this how I do it stuff... > we will

Re: Hello Phoenix Linux Users Group! What Goes On at Installfest?

2017-12-15 Thread Todd Cole
yes we do installs yes we build stuff both yours and ours and others yes we do drivers a lot of chat a lot of "who knows how to XX" a lot of what is the best distro? and this how I do it stuff... we will be in room 206-207 10am to 4pm upstairs thu the double doors if we are busy we skip lunch

Re: Hello Phoenix Linux Users Group! What Goes On at Installfest?

2017-12-15 Thread techlists
Cool!! According to the PLUG website: WHEN: The 1st and 3rd Saturdays each month from 10am till 4pm WHERE: The University of Advancing Technology, 2625 W. Baseline Road Tempe, AZ 85283-1056 Is it still upstairs? On 2017-12-15 09:41, Andrew McRobb wrote: > As far as I can tell, yes. :) > >

Re: Hello Phoenix Linux Users Group! What Goes On at Installfest?

2017-12-15 Thread Andrew McRobb
As far as I can tell, yes. :) Andrew McRobb Full-time Software Developer Part-time Freelancer On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:30 AM, wrote: > > Is this an event where one can go to to learn about stuff like installing > a driver and maybe discovering what one does not know? > > > > On 2017-12-14 10:1

Re: Hello Phoenix Linux Users Group! What Goes On at Installfest?

2017-12-15 Thread techlists
Is this an event where one can go to to learn about stuff like installing a driver and maybe discovering what one does not know? On 2017-12-14 10:10, Stephen Partington wrote: > ususally a mix of both. I know I attended one at a Sr living center that had > a bunch of people from the area interes

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Matthew Crews
Seconded. Use 'apt' not 'apt-get'. I believe Debian (and it's derivatives) have pseudo-deprecated apt-get in favor of apt. Further reading: https://itsfoss.com/apt-vs-apt-get-difference/amp/ Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com), Swiss-based encrypted email. Original Message

Re: apt

2017-12-15 Thread Stephen Partington
try just run 'apt --fix-broken' Also do not use apt-get but instead use apt. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Michael wrote: > sudo apt-get install > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > You might want to run 'apt --fix-broken install'

Re: Hello Phoenix Linux Users Group! What Goes On at Installfest?

2017-12-15 Thread Steve Litt
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:39:03 -0700 Todd Cole wrote: > Andrew while there are many good places I use Resell Electronics > 850 W Lincoln St, Phoenix, AZ 85007 6-4 M-F ignore the online store > and just stop buy and think bulk prices more you buy the cheaper > I typically buy the parts computers hp

apt

2017-12-15 Thread Michael
sudo apt-get install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt --fix-broken install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: ufraw : Depends: ufraw-batch (= 0.22+cvs20170121+r2272~rdeb7~0~crass~ubu