On a whim I rolled back to my kernel from when It was last running 16.04
successfully (for some reason I thought this would not work) and the server
is up and running. Now to find out what was not included to load my disk
subsystem.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 3:48 PM Stephen Partington
wrote:
> wei
weird. I currently have no issues with networking. and technically it is
not an emulation layer. It is supposed to be an api set or something that
runs a Linux kernel under windows natively.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 2:42 PM Michael Butash wrote:
> Last time I tried WSL was with getting this lapto
Last time I tried WSL was with getting this laptop a few years ago. As a
network guy, I sort of just sat there stunned that the frigging thing
couldn't network. Why the hell would you make a linux emulation layer that
couldn't network? Is this still Ballmer-hate?
What the hell is good in this d
well microsoft has made good improvements with WSL and you can do some neat
things like that
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:27 AM Michael Butash wrote:
> Upgrading to 18.04 broke like everything for me (kde, wm, graphics
> drivers), it's what single-handedly drove me to arch, so ymmv.
>
> My experie
Upgrading to 18.04 broke like everything for me (kde, wm, graphics
drivers), it's what single-handedly drove me to arch, so ymmv.
My experience with arch hasn't been much better of late, so take it for
what you will. Arch updates blew up my desktop, and my laptop I'm afraid
to reboot as my last w
