In my attempts to flee ubuntu before (unsuccessful), I tried mint debian
edition on my new laptop, and found it to be something of a basketcase.
Graphic issues, lock-ups, very odd app issues, lack of proprietary
support (ahem, vmware, amd), etc with cinnamon, switched to mate, found
it to be b
But they are based on an Ubuntu core so that will have an effect.
On Aug 3, 2015 1:23 PM, "Michael Havens" wrote:
> Mint is NOT ubuntu.
>
> On 8/3/15, Kevin Fries wrote:
> > I thought about trying Mint, but Ubuntu makes some horrible design
> > choices. Went to Arch, and have never looked back.
You can get a Debian core Mint now as well (on version 2 based on Debian
Jessie.)
On Aug 3, 2015 1:16 PM, "Kevin Fries" wrote:
> I thought about trying Mint, but Ubuntu makes some horrible design
> choices. Went to Arch, and have never looked back. If it isn't in pacman,
> AUR almost always has
On 8/3/15, Michael Havens wrote:
> I've been using Mint since version 12.
>
> On 8/3/15, Keith Smith wrote:
>>
>> I tried Ubuntu first and moved to Mint within a month or so... Been
>> using Mint for maybe a year and a half... I really like it!!
>>
>>
>> On 2015-08-03 13:23, Michael Havens wrot
I've been using Mint since version 12.
On 8/3/15, Keith Smith wrote:
>
> I tried Ubuntu first and moved to Mint within a month or so... Been
> using Mint for maybe a year and a half... I really like it!!
>
>
> On 2015-08-03 13:23, Michael Havens wrote:
>> Mint is NOT ubuntu.
>>
>> On 8/3/15, Ke
I tried Ubuntu first and moved to Mint within a month or so... Been
using Mint for maybe a year and a half... I really like it!!
On 2015-08-03 13:23, Michael Havens wrote:
Mint is NOT ubuntu.
On 8/3/15, Kevin Fries wrote:
I thought about trying Mint, but Ubuntu makes some horrible desig
Mint is NOT ubuntu.
On 8/3/15, Kevin Fries wrote:
> I thought about trying Mint, but Ubuntu makes some horrible design
> choices. Went to Arch, and have never looked back. If it isn't in pacman,
> AUR almost always has it, and if the packager does something silly (for a
> while, VIM did not hav
I thought about trying Mint, but Ubuntu makes some horrible design
choices. Went to Arch, and have never looked back. If it isn't in pacman,
AUR almost always has it, and if the packager does something silly (for a
while, VIM did not have python support, so you couldn't use NERDTree!), I
can alwa
yeah... mint is the only thing i run.
On 8/3/15, Keith Smith wrote:
>
> Put Mint 17 on it. I think Mint 17 is based on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
>
> I'm running Mint 17 KDE and here is what my version file(s) say:
>
>
> cat /etc/*-release
> DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
> DISTRIB_RELEASE=17
> DISTRIB_CODENAME=q
Put Mint 17 on it. I think Mint 17 is based on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
I'm running Mint 17 KDE and here is what my version file(s) say:
cat /etc/*-release
DISTRIB_ID=LinuxMint
DISTRIB_RELEASE=17
DISTRIB_CODENAME=qiana
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Linux Mint 17 Qiana"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="14.04, Trusty Ta
http://symplepc.com/blogs/news/16853255-symple-introduces-the-89-planet-friendly-ubuntu-linux-web-workstation.html
I wish we could get something other than Ubuntu pre-installed!
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phx
11 matches
Mail list logo
