Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-31 Thread Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss
c 30, 2020, 4:02 PM, Rusty Ramser < rusty_ram...@hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, Seabass. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> RAID-6 comes to mind, since it will support

RE: Built for Failure

2020-12-31 Thread Rusty Ramser via PLUG-discuss
...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf Of Seabass via PLUG-discuss Sent: Thursday, 31 December 2020 11:01 To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org Cc: Seabass Subject: Built for Failure Weird question: I can get a bunch of ancient (~2013) HDDs. Each have varying amounts of space, and few (if any) are

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Todd Cole via PLUG-discuss
l.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, Seabass. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> RAID-6 comes to mind, since it will support two disk failures >>>> simultaneously... and it sounds like you just may experience that with >

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss
ller hardware/software support >>> configuring a RAID-6 array? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] *On >>> Behalf Of *Seabass vi

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Seabass via PLUG-discuss
. and it sounds like you just may experience that with >>> these disks. Does your disk controller hardware/software support >>> configuring a RAID-6 array? >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> From: PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Todd Cole via PLUG-discuss
rdware/software support >> configuring a RAID-6 array? >> >> >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> >> *From:* PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] *On >> Behalf Of *Seabass via PLUG-discuss >> *Sent:* Thursday, 31 December 20

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.phxlinux.org] *On > Behalf Of *Seabass via PLUG-discuss > *Sent:* Thursday, 31 December 2020 11:01 > *To:* plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > *Cc:* Seabass > *Subject:* Built for Failure > > > > > Weird question: > > I can get a

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Seabass via PLUG-discuss
un...@lists.phxlinux.org] On Behalf > Of Seabass via PLUG-discuss > Sent: Thursday, 31 December 2020 11:01 > To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > Cc: Seabass > Subject: Built for Failure > > Weird question: > > I can get a bunch of ancient (~2013) HDDs. Each have varyin

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Ed via PLUG-discuss
Sounds like you are looking for a RAID case - and time to keep it up and running. I would see it as an opportunity to try out ZFS https://openzfs.org/wiki/Main_Page zfs is ideally suited to working on a bunch of "about to fail" drives - and it might be the easiest at replacing drive while not riski

Re: Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Brian Cluff via PLUG-discuss
How many drives are you talking about using.  If you have a bunch of them, like 6 to 9 drivers, you could combine them into 2 or 3 groups of roughly equal size and then make a each chunk a RAID 0 and then RAID those chunks up with either RAID1 or RAID5/6 depending on how much redundancy you want

Built for Failure

2020-12-30 Thread Seabass via PLUG-discuss
Weird question: I can get a bunch of ancient (~2013) HDDs. Each have varying amounts of space, and few (if any) are ever the same size. These were marked to be disposed, though that is just because of age or having plenty that are better. Thus I can take them. However, them being this old, and