Re: r u familiar with Docker?

023 at 10:17 PM Michael Butash wrote: > One cannot downplay the importance of things like this today, particularly > with k8s and various iterations of it around docker. NAT is not a foreign > concept, or shouldn't be in 2023. > > I remember working in Silicon Valley circa 1999

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

One cannot downplay the importance of things like this today, particularly with k8s and various iterations of it around docker. NAT is not a foreign concept, or shouldn't be in 2023. I remember working in Silicon Valley circa 1999 and no one had firewalls. Our call center was on public ip's

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

f a self-respecting developer today or the past 20 > years. > > Understanding basic Layer 1-7 of the network OSI model is the key. > > Docker relies heavily on NAT and IP routing between systems. Even installing > a typical web/app/db stack requires local socket interac

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

Agreed, Docker is a runtime isolation for applications with a fully containerized approach for things running within them. Networking is entirely integral to this, so you need to understand ip addressing, nat, tcp/udp ports, route table isolation (namespaces), things like that if playing

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

Docker is not a true VM. And to Mike's point it has a very tight network layer to keep the containers from pooping on each other. If you want a visual, portainer was a Handy tool for this. There is some really solid docker documentation out there and walk throughs. On Tue, Jun 13, 2023, 8:33

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

t;when a packet in a pocket hits a socket" like a childhood rhyme that goes unheard, and really should if you call yourself a self-respecting developer today or the past 20 years. Understanding basic Layer 1-7 of the network OSI model is the key. Docker relies heavily on NAT and IP routing be

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

ouple of sockets. Docker is optional. How can I do something like a "signal trace” in Windows? -David Schwartz > On Jun 13, 2023, at 2:19 PM, Michael Butash via PLUG-discuss > wrote: > > Docker should be an inside to outside port mapping for your application. The >

Re: r u familiar with Docker?

Docker should be an inside to outside port mapping for your application. The outside port maps needs to reflect your firewall, load balancer, or whatever forwards traffic to it as the destination. [internet]-[firewall]-[host]-[docker] - you want to thread the needle of ports

r u familiar with Docker?

I’m looking for someone familiar with Docker who can help me out a little bit. I’m working on an app with a REST-based web service that I’ve been building inside of a VM (VirtualBox) running Win 10. I’m having trouble getting the service part working on a remote server, and someone suggested

Re: Docker

Also for kubernetes deployments the Dockershim has been deprecated and the move to containerd for your CRI runtime is a good option. Nice thing about podman is that all your Docker files still work - plug & play 8) On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 11:08 AM Snyder, Alexander J via PLUG-discuss w

Re: Docker

even if you're still running containers > as root, is that is plays nicely with systemd/cgroups. Docker containers > would end up running in whatever cgroup the docker daemon was running in > rather than the one the docker command was run from. > > So in a way, podman can be mad

Re: Docker

podman is free and available in most distributions now. One of the advantages of podman, even if you're still running containers as root, is that is plays nicely with systemd/cgroups. Docker containers would end up running in whatever cgroup the docker daemon was running in rather than the one

Re: Docker

gt; -- > Thanks, > Alex. > > > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:49 PM Shaun Anderson via PLUG-discuss < > plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote: > >> Some churn going on in the Docker space right now. >> https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/2314#issuec

Re: Docker

Is podman free? I assumed it was locked up behind a rhel subscription pay-wall. -- Thanks, Alex. On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 1:49 PM Shaun Anderson via PLUG-discuss < plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote: > Some churn going on in the Docker space right now. > https://github.co

Re: Docker

Some churn going on in the Docker space right now. https://github.com/docker/hub-feedback/issues/2314#issuecomment-1468633085 Organizations that host their images are having to convert their free legacy accounts to newer organization accounts and sounds like it's not going smoothly. This could

Re: Docker

I have used RHEL, Ubuntu (Preferred), and Amazon Linux (RHEL/Cent related) Docker doesn't care too much, choose the Distro you trust and go from there. On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:34 PM Steve B via PLUG-discuss < plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote: > I"m looking to dip my to

Docker

I"m looking to dip my toes into Docker for use on my home network. Reading up on what to consider for running atop the bare metal it seems like two of the most mentioned have been discontinued - CoreOS and RancherOS, and Atomic supposedly is not quite ready for production. At least acco

Docker and MINDS

Anyone have experience with deploying MINDS in docker and maybe some step by step instruction. I'm also using portainer\ -- Keith D. Miller --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your

Anybody see this announcement between MS and Docker?

This looks interesting: https://blog.docker.com/2014/10/docker-microsoft-partner-distributed-applications/ Not so much for the MS part, but the general concept that has been evolving within the Linux environment. I’m not sure I totally understand it, tho. I attended an Amazon “Big Data